RouterStation performance

Post new topic   Reply to topic    DD-WRT Forum Index -> Ubiquiti Devices
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
cz_ranger
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 11 Feb 2009
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 22:30    Post subject: RouterStation performance Reply with quote
Hi,

what is the RS network performance ? (netperf, iperf - TCP) I seem to have trouble going over 25mbit on both ethernet and wireless with the stock opewrt. Is DD-WRT doin any better ?

Regards, Tom
Sponsor
wehrhard
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 8
Location: Bad Homburg

PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 12:15    Post subject: Reply with quote
Try it, the version is 24 h free as a trial-version.
_________________
300 Routerboards, 250 Nanostations, 150 Buffalo/Linksys with DD-WRT.
3 x 100 MB FD Backbone
cz_ranger
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 11 Feb 2009
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 12:36    Post subject: Reply with quote
I it is not that easy there is no shell access in the trial version, there is no netperf or iperf installed. So no, I can not do a comparable test myself. I would if I could ...
BrainSlayer
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Jun 2006
Posts: 7492
Location: Dresden, Germany

PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 22:51    Post subject: Reply with quote
testing with iperf is a bad idea. iperf takes too much cpu load. so connect a laptop behind and use the laptop as test client. running measurement tools on the device itself will always give lower results since the available cpu power is a big point in high speed links
_________________
"So you tried to use the computer and it started smoking? Sounds like a Mac to me.." - Louis Rossmann https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eL_5YDRWqGE&t=60s
cz_ranger
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 11 Feb 2009
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 10:16    Post subject: Reply with quote
Obviously you either don't know the truth or don't want to disclose it. Either way you are wrong, since there was a SW issue which is now fixed on OpenWRT. The figures are much better even when running netperf/iperf directly on the tested board...
skyland
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:24    Post subject: Reply with quote
Using one RouterStation and one DCMA-82 on each site , the maximum throughput is 25Mbits/sec........

I don't not why....... The 3rd Ethernet does not work at all on the eight RouterStation that I have

Maybe this is a hardware or firmware problem ( http://forum.ubnt.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8334 )
rinja
DD-WRT User


Joined: 16 Nov 2008
Posts: 83
Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:49    Post subject: Request more details - Routerstation 3rd Ethernet Reply with quote
Quote:
skyland Posted: 26 Feb 2009 02:24 Post subject:
Using one RouterStation and one DCMA-82 on each site , the maximum throughput is 25Mbits/sec........

I don't not why....... The 3rd Ethernet does not work at all on the eight RouterStation that I have

Maybe this is a hardware or firmware problem ( http://forum.ubnt.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8334 )


interesting...r u having "any" issues w/the DCMA-82 radio?...i'm just wondering if there is any correlation between the 3rd ehternet port not working & the DCMA-82 radio since i'm having some issues that i think is related to the DCMA-82 radio...i have the DCMA-82 radio in slot1 on the routerstation and configured as "client bridge" and the radio cycles between connect/reconnect to AP continuously....i've got a replacement radio on the way...i'll test ethernet port3 w/the DCMA-82 today....cheers...;-}

_________________
WRT54G-TM (12/17/08) mega-11218
WRT600N (07/22/09) std-12533
EOC-2610 (07/22/09) std-12533
EOC-5610 (07/22/09) std-12533
UBNT RS 12188
BrainSlayer
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Jun 2006
Posts: 7492
Location: Dresden, Germany

PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 13:38    Post subject: Reply with quote
cz_ranger wrote:
Obviously you either don't know the truth or don't want to disclose it. Either way you are wrong, since there was a SW issue which is now fixed on OpenWRT. The figures are much better even when running netperf/iperf directly on the tested board...


i dont think so. i'm working together with the openwrt guys. i just told the best way to get realistic results and you are punishing me for this. nice guy

_________________
"So you tried to use the computer and it started smoking? Sounds like a Mac to me.." - Louis Rossmann https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eL_5YDRWqGE&t=60s
Sash
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 17619
Location: Hesse/Germany

PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 20:19    Post subject: Reply with quote
the RS has some strange hw problems like some bad soldered ethernet switches, silicon bugs and other things.
i think we will have some more problems with this bad hw in the future until it will be fixed in higher rev. so dont expect to much out of it.
i will wait a few months before i'll purchase my 1st test sample

_________________
Forum Guidelines...How to get help
&
Forum Rules
&
RTFM/STFW
&
Throw some buzzwords into the WIKI search Exclamation
_________________
I'm NOT rude, just offer pure facts!
_________________
Atheros (TP-Link & Clones, etc ) debrick service in EU
_________________
Guide on HowTo be Safe, Secure and Protect Your Online Anonymity!
BrainSlayer
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Jun 2006
Posts: 7492
Location: Dresden, Germany

PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 22:40    Post subject: Reply with quote
the dma cpu hw bug will very unlikelly be fixed. i contributed a workaround for the hal to openwrt as well, but atheros told me that this will not be fixed since it only affects ar5006 chipsets, but not the newer 802.11n ar5008 and ar9xxx chipsets. i havent tested the ar7200 yet, but it has only a minipci express slot, so its definitly not comparable
_________________
"So you tried to use the computer and it started smoking? Sounds like a Mac to me.." - Louis Rossmann https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eL_5YDRWqGE&t=60s
BrainSlayer
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Jun 2006
Posts: 7492
Location: Dresden, Germany

PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 22:41    Post subject: Reply with quote
but as additionap performance information. i have a older litestation x running with a single mini pci card in 802.11a turbo mode which brings here around 60 mbit throughput. this measurements can also be taken for the routerstation. its just a question of the right wifi configuration. for point to point links its always good to enable fast framing for example
_________________
"So you tried to use the computer and it started smoking? Sounds like a Mac to me.." - Louis Rossmann https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eL_5YDRWqGE&t=60s
skyland
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:44    Post subject: Reply with quote
=========
INDOOR TEST
=========

Node A ( Apache Mac Os X Web Server )

1 RouterStation WDS AP
1 DCMA-82 ( 17 dBm tx power , no antenna)
firewall disable
WEP security
no wds mac address
default ACK 2000
signal- 59
normal mode ( throughput 24.8 Mbits/sec - 3.1 MB/s)
turbo mode & fast framing enable ( throughput 56 Mbits/sec - 7 MB/s)
ping around 2/ms


Node B ( Safari Browser )

1 RouterStation WDS Station
1 DCMA-82 ( 17 dBm tx power , no antenna )
firewall disable
WEP security
no wds mac address
default ACK 2000
signal- 59
normal mode ( throughput 24.8 Mbits/sec - 3.1 MB/s)
turbo mode & fast framing enable ( throughput 56 Mbits/sec - 7 MB /s)
ping around 2/ms

--- 10.10.20.2 ping statistics ---
1228 packets transmitted, 1228 packets received, 0% packet loss


==========
OUTDOOR TEST
==========

Node A ( Apache Mac Os X Web Server )

1 RouterStation WDS AP
1 DCMA-82 ( 17 dBm tx power , 28 dbi dish )
firewall disable
WEP security
no wds mac address
Wireless link 51 km
signal- 63
ping around 2/ms
normal mode ( throughput 24.8 Mbits/sec - 3.1 MB/s)
turbo mode & fast framing enable ( No tested yet )


Node B ( Safari Browser )

1 RouterStation WDS Station
1 DCMA-82 ( 17 dBm tx power , 28 dbi dish )
firewall disable
WEP security
no wds mac address
Wireless link 51 km
signal- 63
ping around 2/ms
normal mode ( throughput 24.8 Mbits/sec - 3.1 MB/s)
turbo mode & fast framing enable ( No tested yet )
Kaloz
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 15:56    Post subject: Reply with quote
BrainSlayer wrote:

i dont think so. i'm working together with the openwrt guys. i just told the best way to get realistic results and you are punishing me for this. nice guy


Stop this FUD.
BrainSlayer
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Jun 2006
Posts: 7492
Location: Dresden, Germany

PostPosted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 18:35    Post subject: Reply with quote
FUD is not the right word here Imre.
_________________
"So you tried to use the computer and it started smoking? Sounds like a Mac to me.." - Louis Rossmann https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eL_5YDRWqGE&t=60s
Sash
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 17619
Location: Hesse/Germany

PostPosted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 18:37    Post subject: Reply with quote
@skyland

looks like nice performance. how much load does it produce?

_________________
Forum Guidelines...How to get help
&
Forum Rules
&
RTFM/STFW
&
Throw some buzzwords into the WIKI search Exclamation
_________________
I'm NOT rude, just offer pure facts!
_________________
Atheros (TP-Link & Clones, etc ) debrick service in EU
_________________
Guide on HowTo be Safe, Secure and Protect Your Online Anonymity!
Goto page 1, 2  Next Display posts from previous:    Page 1 of 2
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DD-WRT Forum Index -> Ubiquiti Devices All times are GMT

Navigation

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum