Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2021 9:30 Post subject: New Build - 09/07/2021 - r47377
[WARNING]: This thread is only for feedback on this beta release for developers and the community's benefit.
DO NOT flash this beta release unless you understand the risks involved and device specificrecovery methods.
Avoid discussions! Create threads for questions, general problems or use search; this thread is not for support.
Please list router model & revision, operating & wireless mode(s) and exact filename/firmware image flashed.
Issues, observations, and/or workarounds reported:
• DNScrypt 1.95 can still be used in the GUI, but v2 (not compatible) requires Golang and thus Entware. #6246
• WDS does not work on Broadcom ARM devices(only MIPS<->MIPS) & bridge modes on k4.4 devices may sometimes work
in some configurations for certain builds but are not supported by the bcmdhd driver. Use client or repeater instead.
• VAPs not working at bootfixed for unbridged VAPs in40562 - 40566. Effective startup commandsdiscussion thread is here.
• If start-up scripts do not work from USB add a delay, e.g. wait script or 'sleep 25'.
• Broadcom ARM devices if 5 GHz channels are missing, via Telnet/SSH: 'nvram set brcm_unlock=1' 'nvram commit' 'reboot'
• Show us your findings with steps to reproduce, configuration, output, logs and important information below!
Important:
• For issues provide applicable info: 'dmesg', 'cat /tmp/var/log/messages', syslog, klog, serial, strace, tcpdump, wireshark etc.
• Any firewall NAT or WAN issues, show output: 'iptables -vnL', 'iptables -t nat -vnL', 'iptables -t mangle -vnL' and /tmp/.ipt file.
• Search SVN tickets & discuss in forum before opening. Before reporting: reset & manually set up, not restore from a backup.
• Please include operating & wireless modes (e.g. Gateway, Router, AP, CB, WDS, Mesh) & relevant configuration information.
Asus RT-N12B really is the Asus RT-N12D1
DD-WRT v3.0-r47377 mega (09/07/21)
Linux 4.4.283 #11688 Tue Sep 7 09:46:01 +07 2021 mips
'dd-wrt.v24-47377_NEWD-2_K3.x_mega.bin'
GUI installl over r47371
WAP + isolated guest net
all good
Router/Version: Netgear R7000 Firmware: DD-WRT v3.0-r47377 std (09/07/21) Kernel: Linux 4.4.283 #4016 SMP Tue Sep 7 04:22:56 +07 2021 armv7l Mode: Gateway, Wireless AP, Static Leases. CTF & FA Enabled. NAT and QOS Off. All services off under Status>Sys-info. Reset: Nope. Previous: 09-03-2021-r47305 Status: Working so far, still testing. Temperatures: CPU 65.2 °C / WL0 50.1 °C / WL1 55.6 °C Base CFE: Modified Asus ASUS RT-AC68P/ASUS RT-AC68U (C0 Model CFE V1.3.0.7) Configured as a stock R7000.
Speedtest.jpg
Description:
Speedtest Over 5.8GHz Wireless.
Filesize:
62.3 KB
Viewed:
2998 Time(s)
Logs.txt
Description:
Full system logs. MAC scrubbed, password scrubbed, the fun stuff at the bottom as usual!
The search domain that every ISP is shoving in our throats is just another form of tracking/data mining and it's a very successful one,not far from what they use their DNS for.
Therefore if user chose the option Ignore WAN DNS the search domain automatically has to be removed and ignored as well.
So far by just removing and ignoring the WAN/ISP DNS is a half ass done job when it comes to...some form of privacy protection....IN MY OPINION _________________ Router: ASUS AC1900(RT-AC68U)
The search domain that every ISP is shoving in our throats is just another form of tracking/data mining and it's a very successful one,not far from what they use their DNS for.
Therefore if user chose the option Ignore WAN DNS the search domain automatically has to be removed and ignored as well.
So far by just removing and ignoring the WAN/ISP DNS is a half ass done job when it comes to...some form of privacy protection....IN MY OPINION
Joined: 08 May 2018 Posts: 14221 Location: Texas, USA
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2021 19:24 Post subject:
I don't know whether or not to remove or split. Is this feedback? Is this a flash report?
Also, details of @twindragon6's specific configuration would help.
Sorry, I don't mean to be anal, but it should not be up to the rest of us to assume anything.
This is a pure FACT,at least when it comes to Spectrum (former TimeWarner) as they forcing this search domain without any user's consent and twindragon6 config has nothing to do with it,it's just irrelevant in this case. I see that your ISP doesn't do that or you might have some option in your modem to opt-out,trust me it's not the case with majority of us.
Nevertheless when user chose to ignore the WAN/ISP DNS the script should check for WAN Search domain and if present to remove and ignore on any feature lease renewals.
It shouldn't be to hard to implement. _________________ Router: ASUS AC1900(RT-AC68U)
I don't know whether or not to remove or split. Is this feedback? Is this a flash report?
Also, details of @twindragon6's specific configuration would help.
Sorry, I don't mean to be anal, but it should not be up to the rest of us to assume anything.
It's feedback on the latest build, I just try to include as much of my system logs and config as possible to aid in future development. I can supply any configuration information that you wish. No issues so far in this one, it's running great! Thanks BS!
This is a pure FACT,at least when it comes to Spectrum (former TimeWarner) as they forcing this search domain without any user's consent and twindragon6 config has nothing to do with it,it's just irrelevant in this case. I see that your ISP doesn't do that or you might have some option in your modem to opt-out,trust me it's not the case with majority of us.
Nevertheless when user chose to ignore the WAN/ISP DNS the script should check for WAN Search domain and if present to remove and ignore on any feature lease renewals.
It shouldn't be to hard to implement.
The search domain that every ISP is shoving in our throats is just another form of tracking/data mining and it's a very successful one,not far from what they use their DNS for.
Therefore if user chose the option Ignore WAN DNS the search domain automatically has to be removed and ignored as well.
So far by just removing and ignoring the WAN/ISP DNS is a half ass done job when it comes to...some form of privacy protection....IN MY OPINION :!: