So, common threshold and sampling_down_factor settings for all CPU's.
Thank you very much, blkt.
Corona anguish is my only excuse for not searching first ;-(
Joined: 18 Mar 2014 Posts: 12885 Location: Netherlands
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 15:23 Post subject:
Router Model: Netgear R7800
Firmware Version: DD-WRT v3.0-r42819 std (03/30/20)
Kernel Version: Linux 4.9.217 #536 SMP Mon Mar 30 02:08:38 +03 2020 armv7l
Upgraded from: DD-WRT v3.0-r42729 std (03/18/20)
Reset: No, not this time
Status: Up and running for 8 hours, basic setup as Gateway, static leases, OpenVPN client (on PIA) with Policy Based Routing up and running, 2,4GHz, 5Ghz, USB storage NAS working with errors
Errors: 1. Since the introduction of ksmbd, I cannot save to an ntfs partition on the routers USB drive: wrong parameter.
2. DNS leak see: http://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/6020
Otherwise build is fine
Resolved: 1. Pushed DNS servers from VPN provider are used starting with build 41120, if you do not want that, add the following to the Additional Config of the VPN client:
pull-filter ignore "dhcp-option DNS"
2. Build 41174 has an improved VPN Policy Based Routing, it is now possible to use the VPN route command i.e. to route a DNS server via the VPN (in this way you will get rid of the DNS leak), see: https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/6815#comment:1 , and for DNS leaks the second posting of this thread: https://forum.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=318662 3. Another improvement on PBR is that local routes are now copied over to the alternate routing table so there is communication if you have unbridged VAP's and you can set the router's IP on PBR.
See: https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/6821#comment:3 4. Starting with build 41174, the PBR has become more versatile, you can now use " from [IP address] to [IP address] ", so if you enter the following in the PBR field:
192.168.1.124 to 95.85.16.212 #ipleak.net, it will only route IP address 95.85.16.212 (which is ip leak.net) from my IP address 192.168.1.124 via the VPN everything else from this IP address will route via the WAN (this is just an example).
See: https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/6822
Although this command itself supports routing per port this is however only available starting from K 4.17 so we have to rely on scripting for per port routing until then.
5. New OpenVPN TLS ciphers are added in 41308 see: https://svn.dd-wrt.com/changeset/41308 6. Starting with build 41304 you can now choose which TLS Key you want to use: TLS Auth or the newer/better TLS Crypt. See https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/6845#comment:17 7. Builds from 41786 onwards, when using an OVPN server to connect to your local LAN clients, access might be prevented because of a patch which should solve a recent vulnerability ( see: https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/6928)
This can be mitigated with the following firewall rule:
Code:
iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -o br0 -s $(nvram get openvpn_net)/$(nvram get openvpn_tunmask) -j MASQUERADE
When using WireGuard you can run into the same trouble,i.e. not being able to access your local LAN clients. For WireGuard this is the workaround:
Code:
iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -o br0 -s $(nvram get oet1_ipaddr)/$(nvram get oet1_netmask) -j MASQUERADE
This method described above also has security and logging concerns as all traffic has the same source address (your router)
An alternate method is using the following rule but it only works if the VPN or Wireguard interface is up and if your VPN or Wireguard interface goes down you have to reapply or run a continuous script checking/applying:
OpenVPN server:
Code:
iptables -t raw -I PREROUTING -i br0 -d $(nvram get openvpn_net)/$(nvram get openvpn_tunmask) -j ACCEPT
WireGuard:
Code:
iptables -t raw -I PREROUTING -i br0 -d $(nvram get oet1_ipaddr)/$(nvram get oet1_netmask) -j ACCEPT
This rule can expose your LAN side to the CVE attack, but if you have your IOT things separated and tight control over your LAN you should be good, if your LAN is hacked you have got bigger problems.
Builds starting with 41813 have an option button in OpenVPN and Wireguard for disabling the CVE-patch 14899
Joined: 17 Sep 2009 Posts: 22 Location: Las Vegas, NV, United States
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 20:50 Post subject:
I am getting a tremendous amount of
and even across reboots.
randomly thousands of
1 UDP 34 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 6053 ASSURED
From within router, strangley.
Last edited by KellyGAllen on Sat Apr 04, 2020 3:50; edited 1 time in total
Joined: 16 Nov 2015 Posts: 6437 Location: UK, London, just across the river..
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 22:27 Post subject:
6053 on loopback interface is the new smartdns turn it off
Or there must be someting buggy on your build
If anyone has the same router to check his log too
Im fine but im using dot _________________ Atheros
TP-Link WR740Nv1 ---DD-WRT 55630 WAP
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 -DD-WRT 55723 Gateway/DoT,Forced DNS,Ad-Block,Firewall,x4VLAN,VPN
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 -Gargoyle OS 1.15.x AP,DNS,QoS,Quotas
Qualcomm-Atheros
Netgear XR500 --DD-WRT 55779 Gateway/DoH,Forced DNS,AP Isolation,4VLAN,Ad-Block,Firewall,Vanilla
Netgear R7800 --DD-WRT 55819 Gateway/DoT,AD-Block,Forced DNS,AP&Net Isolation,x3VLAN,Firewall,Vanilla
Netgear R9000 --DD-WRT 55779 Gateway/DoT,AD-Block,AP Isolation,Firewall,Forced DNS,x2VLAN,Vanilla
Broadcom
Netgear R7000 --DD-WRT 55460 Gateway/SmartDNS/DoH,AD-Block,Firewall,Forced DNS,x3VLAN,VPN
NOT USING 5Ghz ANYWHERE
------------------------------------------------------
Stubby DNS over TLS I DNSCrypt v2 by mac913
