WEBFLASHED...
SAMBA service would not start. Tried resetting to various Min/Max settings and rebooting. SAMBA service still would not start. Flashed back to 42054 and SAMBA returned to working order. _________________ WRT1900ACSv2
I'm NOT a Marvell person but just gonna mention --- the EA8500 shows samba stopped
in its webif but I can access it just fine using Debian computer or the WIN10.
OpenVPN CLIENT works fine (nordvpn server)
5GHz wpa2 CCMP-128 (AES)working fine 40MHz Mixed AC/N
2.4GHz wpa2 CCMP-128 (AES)working fine 20MHz G
NAS via USB Samba also working, but claims stopped
**** I agree with other posts, SAMBA claims to be STOPPED, but I'm accessing it just fine. ****
I hate to make this claim, it was just a "funny feeling" that just didn't feel right (lol). Internet access seemed as if the connection took a little longer to begin access. Now it MAY have been something strange with my VPN startup. The GUI access was frisky, but internet access seemed to take some number of seconds longer to start than usual. Again... Grain of salt here...
*** 1-30-2020 - Ok, that "feeling" I had was an issue with the vpn DNS servers with slow response times. Not an issue with DD-Wrt. ***
Last edited by scar1943 on Thu Jan 30, 2020 15:40; edited 1 time in total
Windows 10 clients. SMB 1.0 required for Network Browsing to work correctly. No windows clients showed up including the NAS drive. _________________ WRT1900ACSv2
Last edited by DaveI on Tue Jan 28, 2020 22:54; edited 1 time in total
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2020 22:30 Post subject: WRT1900ACS v2 wireless network problem
I have a Linksys WRT1900ACS v2. Wireless network connection is not stable on this version. After losing the wireless network connection, computers can not reconnect to the wireless network and the router must be turned off and on. I'm using only 2.4 Ghz wireless network.
Joined: 10 Nov 2018 Posts: 350 Location: South Carolina
Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2020 15:31 Post subject:
CantRepeat wrote:
Wasn't there a major security flaw discovered in SMB 1 that had everyone disabling it?
Yes, but I think any hack would have to be done from the inside your local area network. Assuming you have a solid firewall, and assuming you can trust your family, or everyone on your lan, it was deemed by Microsoft (if I recall), to be a moot issue.
Joined: 04 Aug 2018 Posts: 1447 Location: Appalachian mountains, USA
Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2020 16:44 Post subject:
scar1943 wrote:
CantRepeat wrote:
Wasn't there a major security flaw discovered in SMB 1 that had everyone disabling it?
Yes, but I think any hack would have to be done from the inside your local area network. Assuming you have a solid firewall, and assuming you can trust your family, or everyone on your lan, it was deemed by Microsoft (if I recall), to be a moot issue.
Actually the trust issue on one's internal network isn't about trusting the family as much as it's about trusting the family's computers and printers and Android phones and refrigerators and whatever not to have become infected with malware that might -- in this specific case and which is probably fairly unlikely in 2020 -- be aimed right at the SMB 1.0 vulnerability.
My wife's intent is sound, but her propensity to click sometimes on things she should not, particularly links in emails in Windows, was enough to motivate me to segment the LAN (keeping my work network quite separate), make sure AP Isolation is used on her day-to-day wifi, and make sure SMB 1.0 is disabled on her machine. I got everything off the last SMB 1.0 network drive last year, and they are banned from the network now. _________________ 2x Netgear XR500 and 3x Linksys WRT1900ACSv2 on 53544: VLANs, VAPs, NAS, station mode, OpenVPN client (AirVPN), wireguard server (AirVPN port forward) and clients (AzireVPN, AirVPN, private), 3 DNSCrypt providers via VPN.
