Tested it a couple of hours on my r7800, still no succes getting the 2.4Ghz radio working properly. It seems to come on, but under channel in status it just shows unknown and it does not help to select other channels, and it does not show up when i scan for networks. Did reset etc. before upgrading.
Maybe it is a common error with the new drivers, so any solution is appreciated.
In other aspects i did not encounter any errors, but the 2.4Ghz radio is important to me.
Joined: 03 Jan 2010 Posts: 7568 Location: YWG, Canada
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2019 1:30 Post subject:
with my adblock file in jffs
latest kong build
root@R7800:~# time nslookup doubleclick.net
nslookup: can't resolve '(null)'
nslookup: can't resolve 'doubleclick.net'
Command exited with non-zero status 1
real 0m 0.35s
user 0m 0.00s
sys 0m 0.00s
r40625 bs build
root@R7800:~# time nslookup doubleclick.net
nslookup: can't resolve '(null)'
nslookup: can't resolve 'doubleclick.net'
Command exited with non-zero status 1
real 0m 0.29s
user 0m 0.00s
sys 0m 0.00s
both consistent.. whats that about..? or is it something in kernal.. both builds have cpu at 1.7/1.7ghz.
and i tried usb again after years of avoiding it was instantly reminded why, for whatever reason my adblock on usb in /tmp/dev/sda1 i think it was, dnsmasq will fail to start and say out of memory, yet the same file in /jffs works..? and once that usb stick touched the router and had 1 single file put on it, it seems to have killed it. now no pc i put it in can see it other than "disk #", cant see partition cant format it cant nothing. the router is now the only thing that can do anything with it.
i think we need a simple "format option with X filesystem" in usb settings..
(no, bs builds are still bad on ipq806x latency/load wise, but the way cake and even fq_codel behaves, can tell kong's fixed build should be good. oh and bs build hfsc is utterly broken even worse, can hardly even get 160mbps, aweful) _________________ LATEST FIRMWARE(S)
BrainSlayer wrote:
we just do it since we do not like any restrictions enforced by stupid cocaine snorting managers
Joined: 08 May 2018 Posts: 14208 Location: Texas, USA
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2019 2:39 Post subject:
If your adblock file is blocking doubleclick.net, then what's the problem? Dnsmasq will not resolve it if it is blocked AFAIK. I have no definite answer for the 'can't resolve (null)' responses, though, without looking deeper.
Joined: 03 Jan 2010 Posts: 7568 Location: YWG, Canada
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2019 2:54 Post subject:
kernel-panic69 wrote:
If your adblock file is blocking doubleclick.net, then what's the problem? Dnsmasq will not resolve it if it is blocked AFAIK. I have no definite answer for the 'can't resolve (null)' responses, though, without looking deeper.
how i presented it was a big typo & i forgot to even mention it, i was pointing out the time differences between them, 350ms vs 290ms. any closer to 400ms and im going to start looking for a cheap x86 machine to move it to with a better cpu, but till then.. _________________ LATEST FIRMWARE(S)
BrainSlayer wrote:
we just do it since we do not like any restrictions enforced by stupid cocaine snorting managers
I guess if local dns is enabled and configured, that behavior is normal, and you would have to specify, but. I won't even get into DD-WRT's implementation of BusyBox.
For giggles:
root@DD-WRT:~# time nslookup doubleclick.net
Name: doubleclick.net
Address 1: 2607:f8b0:4000:80d::200e dfw06s49-in-x0e.1e100.net
Address 2: 216.58.193.142 dfw25s34-in-f14.1e100.net
real 0m 0.02s
user 0m 0.00s
sys 0m 0.02s
can't pay much mind to the upload .... I looked at webserver log and somebody is downloading Kong builds
and according to their IP they are from France --- never know what people are up to these days
