New (KONG) Test Build - 12/26/2018 - r38100M

Post new topic   Reply to topic    DD-WRT Forum Index -> Atheros WiSOC based Hardware
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
jerrytouille
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 11 Dec 2015
Posts: 1304

PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2018 18:43    Post subject: Reply with quote
mrjcd wrote:
jerrytouille wrote:
mrjcd wrote:
Rolling Eyes Had to boot back into other part r38065M kongat 12/22/18
I was still able to ssh into r38100M but it had quit resolving and showed over 3800 active IP connections.
Code:
Dec 27 06:46:00 --- daemon.warn dnsmasq[1752]: Maximum number of concurrent DNS queries reached (max: 150)
Dec 27 06:46:20 --- daemon.warn dnsmasq[1752]: Maximum number of concurrent DNS queries reached (max: 150)
Dec 27 06:46:34 --- daemon.warn dnsmasq[1752]: Maximum number of concurrent DNS queries reached (max: 150)

Just using QUAD9 DNS + local DNS
Same as some previous builds but r38065M never gave trouble.


Is your main ea8500 still on 38100m? How's it going?
NO .... Went back to r38065M....up 1 day 5 hrs now with no problems


Hmm... my 38100 up 2 days 0 rx errors still going strong. r7500v2

Is there a way to count how many dns entries being used up? or any way to max it out to 150 for testing?
Sponsor
mrjcd
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 31 Jan 2015
Posts: 6268
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2018 19:18    Post subject: Reply with quote
jerrytouille wrote:
Hmm... my 38100 up 2 days 0 rx errors still going strong. r7500v2


I only have 5 ~ 6 wireless clients usually but at least 13 other clients on all time looking for whatever ---
-- and then their is the 11 router type devices on 24/7 that look for time every hour Wink

Right now I have 337 active IP connections and that is somewhat average. My Daughter's laptop is holding
142 .. she prolly playing her game -- and the machine running the webserver is holding 63... which varies depending on what/who is crawling around thru it.

The bad juju with r38100 happened in morning about time everyone was getting around --- noticed that was same issue with some other Kong builds recently.
Seems it is not releasing IPs or DNS correctly.
When r38100M killed over I did notice both chromecast devices were holding over 500 connections each and only one of the chromcast
were actually being used ----that just ain't normal .. they usually, like right now, will hold no more than 15 ~ 17 connections while being used.
tatsuya46
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Posts: 7568
Location: YWG, Canada

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2018 23:33    Post subject: Reply with quote
Router Model: r7800

Status k4.9 qos download latency is normal like k3.18 (ethernet)
Reset: no
Errors: see tickets below

https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/5225 *
https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/5603 *
https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/5699
https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/5845
https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/5848
https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/5875
https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/5933
https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/5938
https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/6059
https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/6214
https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/6286
https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/6466
https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/6481 *
https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/6495
https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/6509
https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/6510
https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/6511
https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/6516

included tickets are only those affecting r7800 and kong build only.

wifi load still isnt normal and there is elevated LOCAL latency to the router from extra 5ms~15ms. not a single wifi setting effects it in the slightest.


bripab007 wrote:
So does this mean U-APSD is still not quite fixed?: https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/6511


no its still broken



happy new year

_________________
LATEST FIRMWARE(S)

BrainSlayer wrote:
we just do it since we do not like any restrictions enforced by stupid cocaine snorting managers

[x86_64] Haswell i3-4150/QCA9984/QCA9882 ------> r55488 std
[QUALCOMM] DIR-862L --------------------------------> r55460 std
▲ ACTIVE / INACTIVE ▼
[QUALCOMM] WNDR4300 v1 --------------------------> r50485 std
[BROADCOM] DIR-860L A1 ----------------------------> r50485 std


Sigh.. why do i exist anyway.. | I love you Anthony.. never forget that.. my other 99% that ill never see again..



Last edited by tatsuya46 on Sun Dec 30, 2018 11:03; edited 1 time in total
jerrytouille
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 11 Dec 2015
Posts: 1304

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2018 23:40    Post subject: Reply with quote
tatsuya46 wrote:
wifi load still isnt normal and there is elevated LOCAL latency to the router from extra 5ms~15ms. not a single wifi setting effects it in the slightest.


did this happen in previous build 38065m?
tatsuya46
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Posts: 7568
Location: YWG, Canada

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2018 2:17    Post subject: Reply with quote
jerrytouille wrote:
tatsuya46 wrote:
wifi load still isnt normal and there is elevated LOCAL latency to the router from extra 5ms~15ms. not a single wifi setting effects it in the slightest.


did this happen in previous build 38065m?


yes since k4.9

i see core load spread even if everythings on 1 core, with no clear way to turn it off. governor is already on performance too.

even on local transfers the throughput isnt right, normal levels 530mbps+ for a while with fine latency, throughput drops and latency rises, repeat cycle. this is from desktop on gigabit ethernet cat6 to laptop on wifi 866/866 rates, anything but normal.

https://imgur.com/a/hxmZ2DF

not channel saturation or interference

what is this commit and do we have it already? https://svn.dd-wrt.com/changeset/38099

_________________
LATEST FIRMWARE(S)

BrainSlayer wrote:
we just do it since we do not like any restrictions enforced by stupid cocaine snorting managers

[x86_64] Haswell i3-4150/QCA9984/QCA9882 ------> r55488 std
[QUALCOMM] DIR-862L --------------------------------> r55460 std
▲ ACTIVE / INACTIVE ▼
[QUALCOMM] WNDR4300 v1 --------------------------> r50485 std
[BROADCOM] DIR-860L A1 ----------------------------> r50485 std


Sigh.. why do i exist anyway.. | I love you Anthony.. never forget that.. my other 99% that ill never see again..

murtaza12
DD-WRT User


Joined: 19 Nov 2015
Posts: 122
Location: Pakistan

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2018 8:42    Post subject: Reply with quote
Kind of a noob question, but I noticed this when I went to check RX errors and uptime, the 'active time' and 'busy time' on the R7800 are much higher than on the EA8500.

Is it normal considering the number of Wireless clients on the R7800 is far less than on the EA8500?

R7800
2.4GHz:
http://imgbox.com/yToD203p

5GHz:
http://imgbox.com/iiJPW1KQ

---------------------
EA8500
2.4GHz:
http://imgbox.com/c2nYvLud

5GHz:
http://imgbox.com/K1rzdBbh

_________________
Active devices:
Netgear R7800 - Stock v1.0.2.68
Linksys EA8500 - OpenWRT 19.07.1
ASUS RP-AC68U - 3.0.0.4.382.40019
tatsuya46
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Posts: 7568
Location: YWG, Canada

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2018 8:52    Post subject: Reply with quote
noise on the channel(s) matters too, and what the devices are doing, how long the radios were up for etc. just having them connected on clean spectrum space and idle hardly does much.
_________________
LATEST FIRMWARE(S)

BrainSlayer wrote:
we just do it since we do not like any restrictions enforced by stupid cocaine snorting managers

[x86_64] Haswell i3-4150/QCA9984/QCA9882 ------> r55488 std
[QUALCOMM] DIR-862L --------------------------------> r55460 std
▲ ACTIVE / INACTIVE ▼
[QUALCOMM] WNDR4300 v1 --------------------------> r50485 std
[BROADCOM] DIR-860L A1 ----------------------------> r50485 std


Sigh.. why do i exist anyway.. | I love you Anthony.. never forget that.. my other 99% that ill never see again..

murtaza12
DD-WRT User


Joined: 19 Nov 2015
Posts: 122
Location: Pakistan

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2018 9:34    Post subject: Reply with quote
tatsuya46 wrote:
noise on the channel(s) matters too, and what the devices are doing, how long the radios were up for etc. just having them connected on clean spectrum space and idle hardly does much.


Uptime on both is the same. 3 days and almost 5 hours.

The EA8500 is more prone to interference since the neighbours use the same channels as that. Nobody else uses 11+7, which is what my R7800 is set to.

Also, the only clients connected to the R7800 are my grandmother's tablet and smartphone, which are usually idle, and another cheap tablet that's used for occasional YouTube, for when the annoying cousins are over. That's all.

Most of the wireless activity happens upstairs on the EA8500 with Netflix streaming and torrents and whatnot.

_________________
Active devices:
Netgear R7800 - Stock v1.0.2.68
Linksys EA8500 - OpenWRT 19.07.1
ASUS RP-AC68U - 3.0.0.4.382.40019
tatsuya46
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Posts: 7568
Location: YWG, Canada

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2018 10:33    Post subject: Reply with quote
murtaza12 wrote:
tatsuya46 wrote:
noise on the channel(s) matters too, and what the devices are doing, how long the radios were up for etc. just having them connected on clean spectrum space and idle hardly does much.


Uptime on both is the same. 3 days and almost 5 hours.

The EA8500 is more prone to interference since the neighbours use the same channels as that. Nobody else uses 11+7, which is what my R7800 is set to.

Also, the only clients connected to the R7800 are my grandmother's tablet and smartphone, which are usually idle, and another cheap tablet that's used for occasional YouTube, for when the annoying cousins are over. That's all.

Most of the wireless activity happens upstairs on the EA8500 with Netflix streaming and torrents and whatnot.


the counters could be broken on ea8500, do a speedtest with a device on it, they should rise a good amount

_________________
LATEST FIRMWARE(S)

BrainSlayer wrote:
we just do it since we do not like any restrictions enforced by stupid cocaine snorting managers

[x86_64] Haswell i3-4150/QCA9984/QCA9882 ------> r55488 std
[QUALCOMM] DIR-862L --------------------------------> r55460 std
▲ ACTIVE / INACTIVE ▼
[QUALCOMM] WNDR4300 v1 --------------------------> r50485 std
[BROADCOM] DIR-860L A1 ----------------------------> r50485 std


Sigh.. why do i exist anyway.. | I love you Anthony.. never forget that.. my other 99% that ill never see again..

murtaza12
DD-WRT User


Joined: 19 Nov 2015
Posts: 122
Location: Pakistan

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2018 12:17    Post subject: Reply with quote
tatsuya46 wrote:
murtaza12 wrote:
tatsuya46 wrote:
noise on the channel(s) matters too, and what the devices are doing, how long the radios were up for etc. just having them connected on clean spectrum space and idle hardly does much.


Uptime on both is the same. 3 days and almost 5 hours.

The EA8500 is more prone to interference since the neighbours use the same channels as that. Nobody else uses 11+7, which is what my R7800 is set to.

Also, the only clients connected to the R7800 are my grandmother's tablet and smartphone, which are usually idle, and another cheap tablet that's used for occasional YouTube, for when the annoying cousins are over. That's all.

Most of the wireless activity happens upstairs on the EA8500 with Netflix streaming and torrents and whatnot.


the counters could be broken on ea8500, do a speedtest with a device on it, they should rise a good amount


Stupid me, should've checked if they changed before posting.

Seems like the counters are broken on the EA8500, I had a Netflix stream, a large download and a speedtest running simultaneously, and the numbers didn't budge.

_________________
Active devices:
Netgear R7800 - Stock v1.0.2.68
Linksys EA8500 - OpenWRT 19.07.1
ASUS RP-AC68U - 3.0.0.4.382.40019
jerrytouille
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 11 Dec 2015
Posts: 1304

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2018 15:35    Post subject: Reply with quote
uptime 3 days 148 rx errors (~150gb of traffic) mostly from my mbair no performance issue both cores go up/down fine nice qos (hfsc/fqcodel). best build to date for me. r7500v2

for those having issue (except tatsuya he knows what's he doing:P), at least clear your browser cache or observe in private/incognito mode, backup/screenshot your settings erase nvram flash via ddup. this helped me
bushant
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 18 Nov 2015
Posts: 2029

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2018 15:48    Post subject: Reply with quote
jerrytouille wrote:
at least clear your browser cache or observe in private/incognito mode, backup/screenshot your settings erase nvram flash via ddup. this helped me


Do you do "erase nvram" or "nvram erase"? I can't keep that straight. Or just use Webiface? Or push the reset button?

_________________
Forum Guide Lines (with helpful pointers about how to research your router, where and what firmware to download, where and how to post and many other helpful tips!)
How to get help the right way

Before asking for help - Read the forum guidelines AND Upgrade DD-WRT!
Adblock by eibgrad + Blocklist Collection
jerrytouille
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 11 Dec 2015
Posts: 1304

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2018 16:11    Post subject: Reply with quote
bushant wrote:
jerrytouille wrote:
at least clear your browser cache or observe in private/incognito mode, backup/screenshot your settings erase nvram flash via ddup. this helped me


Do you do "erase nvram" or "nvram erase"? I can't keep that straight. Or just use Webiface? Or push the reset button?


nvram erase is for broadcom. i don't trust webif or reset btn. so yeah erase nvram. you can actually do both to be safe it doesn't hurt so nvram erase erase nvram then ddup --flash-remote <url> done.

https://wiki.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Hard_reset_or_30/30/30#Erasing_NVRAM
htismaqe
DD-WRT User


Joined: 05 Nov 2015
Posts: 471

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2018 16:47    Post subject: Reply with quote
mrjcd wrote:
jerrytouille wrote:
Hmm... my 38100 up 2 days 0 rx errors still going strong. r7500v2


I only have 5 ~ 6 wireless clients usually but at least 13 other clients on all time looking for whatever ---
-- and then their is the 11 router type devices on 24/7 that look for time every hour Wink

Right now I have 337 active IP connections and that is somewhat average. My Daughter's laptop is holding
142 .. she prolly playing her game -- and the machine running the webserver is holding 63... which varies depending on what/who is crawling around thru it.

The bad juju with r38100 happened in morning about time everyone was getting around --- noticed that was same issue with some other Kong builds recently.
Seems it is not releasing IPs or DNS correctly.
When r38100M killed over I did notice both chromecast devices were holding over 500 connections each and only one of the chromcast
were actually being used ----that just ain't normal .. they usually, like right now, will hold no more than 15 ~ 17 connections while being used.


I just had a "freeze" on r37985 after a week of uptime. Everything just stopped working, including the router GUI. After a reboot, all is fine. Nobody is even here and I was watching antenna TV - traffic would have been nearly nothing so it wouldn't have been a load issue.

_________________
Routing:.......Asus RT-AX88U (Asuswrt-Merlin 384.14)
Switching:....Netgear GS608_V3 & GS605_V4, TrendNet TEG-S82G & TEG-S50G
jerrytouille
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 11 Dec 2015
Posts: 1304

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2018 16:59    Post subject: Reply with quote
htismaqe wrote:
I just had a "freeze" on r37985 after a week of uptime. Everything just stopped working, including the router GUI. After a reboot, all is fine. Nobody is even here and I was watching antenna TV - traffic would have been nearly nothing so it wouldn't have been a load issue.


37985 is crap i wouldn't trust it. use either 38065 or the latest 38100
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next Display posts from previous:    Page 2 of 5
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DD-WRT Forum Index -> Atheros WiSOC based Hardware All times are GMT

Navigation

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum