New (KONG) Build - 11/24/2018 - r37845M

Post new topic   Reply to topic    DD-WRT Forum Index -> Atheros WiSOC based Hardware
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Author Message
bripab007
DD-WRT User


Joined: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2018 1:35    Post subject: Reply with quote
tatsuya46 wrote:
https://svn.dd-wrt.com/changeset/37864

not seeing anything 802.11v but hope theres some less stripping in this one..


Interesting. Perhaps more testing and fiddling with a 4.9 build in my future Laughing

_________________
Netgear R7500v2, DD-WRT v3.0-r37845M kongat
Netgear R7000, DD-WRT v3.0-r37715M kongac
Sponsor
tatsuya46
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Posts: 7568
Location: YWG, Canada

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2018 4:21    Post subject: Reply with quote
bripab007 wrote:
tatsuya46 wrote:
https://svn.dd-wrt.com/changeset/37864

not seeing anything 802.11v but hope theres some less stripping in this one..


Interesting. Perhaps more testing and fiddling with a 4.9 build in my future Laughing


would really love to have wnm_sleep_mode, bss_transition, proxy_arp. not pulled out of our hostapd..

band steering would be fabulous.

_________________
LATEST FIRMWARE(S)

BrainSlayer wrote:
we just do it since we do not like any restrictions enforced by stupid cocaine snorting managers

[x86_64] Haswell i3-4150/QCA9984/QCA9882 ------> r55488 std
[QUALCOMM] DIR-862L --------------------------------> r55460 std
▲ ACTIVE / INACTIVE ▼
[QUALCOMM] WNDR4300 v1 --------------------------> r50485 std
[BROADCOM] DIR-860L A1 ----------------------------> r50485 std


Sigh.. why do i exist anyway.. | I love you Anthony.. never forget that.. my other 99% that ill never see again..

elkulo
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 11 Mar 2010
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2018 6:34    Post subject: Reply with quote
Thanks Kong for this great build..QoS it’s working great and in the latest builds I has problems with WiFi 5ghz disconnect with R9000 and EX8000 extender...this build it’s very stable, WiFi continuous to disconnect but after 1 or 2 days, that it’s more than acceptable (in the latest builds WiFi disconnects after 1 or 2 hours).

What are vht160 valid channels for upper than 128?

Valid VHT160 channels are:
36+UUU
64+LLL
100+UUU
128+LLL
<TODO>* ADD REMAINING VHT160 CHANNEL CONFIGS

For max speed extender wants 149 or upper, but I can’t find the right channel. Thanks
tatsuya46
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Posts: 7568
Location: YWG, Canada

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2018 7:12    Post subject: Reply with quote
cause there is no vht160 above 149, it takes 8 channels of space, 149+153+157+161+165 is 5 channels
_________________
LATEST FIRMWARE(S)

BrainSlayer wrote:
we just do it since we do not like any restrictions enforced by stupid cocaine snorting managers

[x86_64] Haswell i3-4150/QCA9984/QCA9882 ------> r55488 std
[QUALCOMM] DIR-862L --------------------------------> r55460 std
▲ ACTIVE / INACTIVE ▼
[QUALCOMM] WNDR4300 v1 --------------------------> r50485 std
[BROADCOM] DIR-860L A1 ----------------------------> r50485 std


Sigh.. why do i exist anyway.. | I love you Anthony.. never forget that.. my other 99% that ill never see again..

elkulo
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 11 Mar 2010
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2018 7:43    Post subject: Reply with quote
Thanks for the explanation tatsuya46...I will try in vht80 and 149 channel and higher
tatsuya46
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Posts: 7568
Location: YWG, Canada

PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2018 9:35    Post subject: Reply with quote
seems the qos in k4.9 is a fair amount.. different.. than 3.18..

websocket performance is utterly down the drain with htb/hfsc+pie, pie was best for me with htb, not so much anymore.. it still is best on delivering full what i enter, speeds, with a FLAT LINE, unlike fq_codel.. which loves to weave up and down by as much as 12mbps.

actually, all are bad with websocket connections unless its fq_codel, totally wasnt true in k33.18, hfsc+codel (not fq) is the best mixed bag of stable near flat line throughput of pie, with (somewhat) acceptable latency when using websockets, still quite elevated, but usable. but this is on ethernet only, over wifi, hfsc (with anything) remains to be abnormally slower even when no core is saturated.

this is for UPLOAD by the way.. download websocket connections seem to be fine. the one thats been free of issues all this time (except when limiting under 1mbps, thats still there)

*shrug*

edit: apparently its only with mobile devices like phones.. even laptop is fine. safari on ios 12.1 has poor uplink latency with websocket connections, only that so far, but on k3.18 pie that doesnt happen, everything is all over the place.. hfsc on smartphones has always given weaker throughput though than htb, on a laptop on wifi its same as htb and ethernet...

_________________
LATEST FIRMWARE(S)

BrainSlayer wrote:
we just do it since we do not like any restrictions enforced by stupid cocaine snorting managers

[x86_64] Haswell i3-4150/QCA9984/QCA9882 ------> r55488 std
[QUALCOMM] DIR-862L --------------------------------> r55460 std
▲ ACTIVE / INACTIVE ▼
[QUALCOMM] WNDR4300 v1 --------------------------> r50485 std
[BROADCOM] DIR-860L A1 ----------------------------> r50485 std


Sigh.. why do i exist anyway.. | I love you Anthony.. never forget that.. my other 99% that ill never see again..

hyppo
DD-WRT User


Joined: 21 Mar 2015
Posts: 56

PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2018 14:32    Post subject: Reply with quote
tatsuya46 wrote:
seems the qos in k4.9 is a fair amount.. different.. than 3.18..

websocket performance is utterly down the drain with htb/hfsc+pie, pie was best for me with htb, not so much anymore.. it still is best on delivering full what i enter, speeds, with a FLAT LINE, unlike fq_codel.. which loves to weave up and down by as much as 12mbps.


I found performance of USB3 is higher on 4.9
Reading USB by SMB via wireless 5GHz gave me 30 MB/s on 3.18 while on 4.9 it is 40 (on voxel it was also 40)
And using FTP it's almost 50 MB/s
htismaqe
DD-WRT User


Joined: 05 Nov 2015
Posts: 471

PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2018 14:48    Post subject: Reply with quote
tatsuya46 wrote:

im close to giving up on https and turning it off, to silence that crap that no one wants to fix. plus https when viewed remotely makes webif slow as molasses, like when viewing ath0 wifi status, change it to ath1, takes an eternity to load..


I tried disabling HTTPS and it didn't fix the problem. Made it A LOT better for sure but didn't completely stop the errors.

_________________
Routing:.......Asus RT-AX88U (Asuswrt-Merlin 384.14)
Switching:....Netgear GS608_V3 & GS605_V4, TrendNet TEG-S82G & TEG-S50G
mrjcd
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 31 Jan 2015
Posts: 6268
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2018 15:01    Post subject: Reply with quote
htismaqe wrote:
tatsuya46 wrote:

im close to giving up on https and turning it off, to silence that crap that no one wants to fix. plus https when viewed remotely makes webif slow as molasses, like when viewing ath0 wifi status, change it to ath1, takes an eternity to load..


I tried disabling HTTPS and it didn't fix the problem. Made it A LOT better for sure but didn't completely stop the errors.

FYI ... In my previous post where showed syslog erros.
Note: I have never had https enabled
Luiso_G
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 19 Apr 2018
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2018 17:19    Post subject: Reply with quote
Router Model: R9000
Status: Running
Reset: Yes
Errors: CPU0 High usage by KSOFTIRQD/0

Enabling QoS cause high utilization on CPU 0 by apparent process ksoftirqd/0 provoking slow/poor transmissions speed on WAN, WLAN and LAN. This is occurring since the last 2 or so previous versions.
aewoo
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 22 Apr 2022
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2022 18:06    Post subject: Reply with quote
mrjcd wrote:
jerrytouille wrote:

As I'm struggling with RX errors, do you mind sharing your wireless settings? .......

Chrome on winders10 is a bit better than on da Linux box Shocked
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/42334981

I have zero errors on all wireless and have chromecast going fairly
regular connected to ath0.1 controlled by devices on ath1.1

Still just using the same ol security ... and nothing fancey.





I am sorry, do you know the router model for the screenshots in your message?
mrjcd
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 31 Jan 2015
Posts: 6268
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2022 18:09    Post subject: Reply with quote
aewoo wrote:
I am sorry, do you know the router model for the screenshots in your message?

EA8500

Cool
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Display posts from previous:    Page 6 of 6
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DD-WRT Forum Index -> Atheros WiSOC based Hardware All times are GMT

Navigation

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum