New (KONG) Test Build - 10/25/2018 (UPDATE 7)

Post new topic   Reply to topic    DD-WRT Forum Forum Index -> Atheros WiSOC based Hardware
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next
Author Message
stalonge
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1865
Location: Fortaleza Ce Brazil

PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 1:18    Post subject: Reply with quote
Yes .. it works without a problem .

Openvpn server
Samba share + ftp
Webserver
Free wifi + other network unbridged (dhcp )
Qos is working giving priority what i need .. netflix .. videos .. spotify .. openvpn and vnc .. thats fine for me ..
Yes .. there is some bufferbloat but i cant notice .. my internet is fast and reliable ..

Very Happy Very Happy

_________________
DDwrt ...it rocks ....
1 R8500 41556 AP OpenVPN webserver RETIRED (bricked)
1 R7800 42912 AP Wireguard webserver JFFS SAMBA FTP usb HD Mesh
1 R7800 42912 Cli Mesh
1 WZR1750 42908 AP Webserver OpenVPN
1 DDx86 Vmware 40260
1 E3000 41027 K3 @500 WAP wifi client
Sponsor
tatsuya46
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Posts: 7385
Location: YWG, Canada

PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 1:44    Post subject: Reply with quote
vit5421 wrote:
stalonge wrote:
after a day working flawless

http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/40740344

Very Happy Very Happy


I dont understand why you think its working flawless? I have the same really bad bufferbloat on 4.9 kernel and 500mbs internet and 2-3 times better bufferbloat on 3.18. So, right now 3.18 is still far ahead of 4.9


most likely he does nothing that cares about latency, voip/gaming/video chats etc

_________________
LATEST FIRMWARE(S)

BrainSlayer wrote:
we just do it since we do not like any restrictions enforced by stupid cocaine snorting managers

[x86_64] Haswell i3-4150/QCA9984/QCA9882 ------> r44901 std
[QUALCOMM] DIR-862L --------------------------------> r44901 std
[QUALCOMM] WNDR4300 v1 --------------------------> r44901 std
[QUALCOMM] DIR-862L --------------------------------> r44901 std
▲ ACTIVE / INACTIVE ▼
[BROADCOM] DIR-860L A1 ----------------------------> r44901 std


If you use DSLReports please enable hi-res bufferbloat.


Sigh.. why do i exist anyway..
bripab007
DD-WRT User


Joined: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 12:26    Post subject: Reply with quote
Man, fq_codel seems significantly better than pie in my limited testing. With the same speed bandwidth settings, fq_codel always wins with much lower latency. I came across a couple research papers yesterday while trying to learn up on it, and both those papers showed that fq_codel typically has lower average and median latency than pie.

Does it just work better for certain connection types or something?

_________________
Netgear R7500v2, DD-WRT v3.0-r37845M kongat
Netgear R7000, DD-WRT v3.0-r37715M kongac
jerrytouille
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 11 Dec 2015
Posts: 1301

PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 12:42    Post subject: Reply with quote
bripab007 wrote:
Man, fq_codel seems significantly better than pie in my limited testing. With the same speed bandwidth settings, fq_codel always wins with much lower latency. I came across a couple research papers yesterday while trying to learn up on it, and both those papers showed that fq_codel typically has lower average and median latency than pie.

Does it just work better for certain connection types or something?


In my case as I understand you would need to setup and use it with Services Priority. For simple QoS of just checking the 4 tcp boxes fq_codel works better hence fq - fair queuing, which does also work with Services priority as well but more aggressively and cpu/bandwidth cost (3-5 Mbps).
bripab007
DD-WRT User


Joined: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 13:09    Post subject: Reply with quote
jerrytouille wrote:
In my case as I understand you would need to setup and use it with Services Priority. For simple QoS of just checking the 4 tcp boxes fq_codel works better hence fq - fair queuing, which does also work with Services priority as well but more aggressively and cpu/bandwidth cost (3-5 Mbps).


Interesting info. I setup just a few services priority in my fq_codel config to prioritize DNS, FaceTime, AT&T VOIP, http_connect (which I *hope* is maybe the initial, new HTTP connection to a site to help initial page load and not something more than that, but darned if I could find any contemporary information on what all those L7 filters are defined as) and to classify as bulk bittorrent.

_________________
Netgear R7500v2, DD-WRT v3.0-r37845M kongat
Netgear R7000, DD-WRT v3.0-r37715M kongac
jerrytouille
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 11 Dec 2015
Posts: 1301

PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 13:17    Post subject: Reply with quote
bripab007 wrote:
jerrytouille wrote:
In my case as I understand you would need to setup and use it with Services Priority. For simple QoS of just checking the 4 tcp boxes fq_codel works better hence fq - fair queuing, which does also work with Services priority as well but more aggressively and cpu/bandwidth cost (3-5 Mbps).


Interesting info. I setup just a few services priority in my fq_codel config to prioritize DNS, FaceTime, AT&T VOIP, http_connect (which I *hope* is maybe the initial, new HTTP connection to a site to help initial page load and not something more than that, but darned if I could find any contemporary information on what all those L7 filters are defined as) and to classify as bulk bittorrent.


Here's my setup and result k3.18 cable 100/10 (117/11 actual) ipv4 high-res:
pie http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/40758619
fq_codel http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/40759042
bripab007
DD-WRT User


Joined: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 14:58    Post subject: Reply with quote
Thanks for that, Jerry. I'm happy with HTB & fq_codel at the moment, but I'm sure the tinkerer in my will play around with Pie again so I appreciate the info.
_________________
Netgear R7500v2, DD-WRT v3.0-r37845M kongat
Netgear R7000, DD-WRT v3.0-r37715M kongac
rawd
DD-WRT User


Joined: 06 Jan 2014
Posts: 175

PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 17:12    Post subject: Reply with quote
150/50 cable

R7800 37490 4.x HTB FQ_CODEL
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/40766630

R7800 37210 4.x HTB FQ_CODEL
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/40576901

Seems to have cut bufferbloat avg's in half, down and up.

_________________
R7800 AP - OpenWrt SNAPSHOT r13951
R7800 AP - r43800 std
R7000 CB - r43904 std
PiHole 5.1.1 - dnscrypt-proxy 2.0.44 - RPi 3 B+
Synology DS220+ - DSM 6.2.3
mrjcd
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 31 Jan 2015
Posts: 5361
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 17:29    Post subject: Reply with quote
EA8500
r37490M
Linux 4.9.135
uptime 1 day, 9:57
all still working great here

http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/40769984
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/40770059
labrok
DD-WRT User


Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Posts: 276
Location: Greece

PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 21:29    Post subject: ROUTER KEEPS HANGING UP UNDER LOAD EA-8500 Reply with quote
EA-8500
Firmware Version
DD-WRT v3.0-r37490M kongat ( 10/22/18 )
Kernel Version
Linux 4.9.135 #232 SMP PREEMPT Mon Oct 22 02:10:08 CEST 2018 armv7l
Happened again 2 times in 20 minutes, i decited to download a huge file via torrent and suddemly router stopped, no wifi no lan no log, got me running in the middle of the night to fix it, it has happened exactly the same with a Broiadcomm device i have (Dir 868l rev C with latest general DD WRT firmware r37442) 10 hours ago exactly same scenario torrent was downloading and puff router hung up....something has to do with torrents...but for now i will go to my old trustworthy 1043ND, cant run in the middle of the night to powercycle the router! i have a log server but i dont see to have catch anyhing at all, probably Router hanged UP for good and sent no data !but if you want to check for yourself my log files are at your sertvice if you want just ask.
nickant
DD-WRT User


Joined: 09 Feb 2016
Posts: 163

PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 23:03    Post subject: Reply with quote
On my EA8500, the K3.18 kernel feels much snappier.
I'm only on ADSL2+ (15DL, 1UL) so I can only dream of some of your >100MBps DL speeds.
On top of that, I have an OpenVPN Client connected, which further reduces speed and adds latency + bufferbloat.
QoS HFSC+FQ_Codel seems most consistant.
Testing with VPN and Firefox addons disabled shows that QoS does improve things.
DSLReports are inconsistant between the K4.9 and K3.18 versions for me, but in use K3.18 feels quicker.
With so many variables (telco QoS, infrastructure (adsl, fibre, cable etc), router model etc, any optimization for one, ie Kong's setup, may not be optimal for others.

_________________
------------------------------------
Linksys EA8500 DD-WRT r44863 (Gateway)
Linksys WRT1900ACv1 DD-WRT r44863 (AP)
Netgear/Telstra V7610 (spare AP)
Billion BiPAC 7800NXL (spare AP)
Netgear WNDR3700v4 DD-WRT r44772 (spare Gateway)
Photos: https://www.flickr.com/photos/nickant44/albums
bushant
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 18 Nov 2015
Posts: 1477
Location: WCentral Indiana USA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2018 0:52    Post subject: Reply with quote
jerrytouille wrote:
Router ModelNetgear R7500v2
Firmware Version DD-WRT v3.0-r37490M kongat (10/22/1Cool
Kernel VersionLinux 4.9.135 #231 SMP PREEMPT Mon Oct 22 01:28:56 CEST 2018 armv7l

Thousands of TX/RX errors. QoS still behind 3.18

Netgear R7500v2
I switched to 37420 [10-21-18] K3.18 yesterday [uptime 1 day,2:08] to see if it was any better for my crappy internet and now this is showing many RX errors 0 TX errors all on ath1.1 almost no traffic there just her android.

_________________
STUBBY DoT install guide----Forum Guide Lines (Please read!) --- How to get help the right way----Reports
mrjcd
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 31 Jan 2015
Posts: 5361
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2018 2:14    Post subject: Reply with quote
just not getting the WiFi erros Cool
---------------
Code:
root@----:~# ifconfig
ath0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr C0:56:27:06:39:FF 
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:470918 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:875055 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:47317716 (45.1 MiB)  TX bytes:793961521 (757.1 MiB)

ath0.1    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr C2:56:27:06:39:FF 
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:635438 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:1359203 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:76341928 (72.8 MiB)  TX bytes:1732962163 (1.6 GiB)

ath1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr C0:56:27:06:3A:00 
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:262789 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:566139 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:58876819 (56.1 MiB)  TX bytes:511317501 (487.6 MiB)

ath1.1    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr C2:56:27:06:3A:00 
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:5337968 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:10761509 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:404450359 (385.7 MiB)  TX bytes:16083517072 (14.9 GiB)

br0       Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr C0:56:27:06:39:FD 
          inet addr:10.72.28.13  Bcast:10.72.28.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:3986676 errors:0 dropped:23854 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:6488312 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:2751298492 (2.5 GiB)  TX bytes:8180706224 (7.6 GiB)

br1       Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr C0:56:27:06:39:FD 
          inet addr:10.15.26.225  Bcast:10.15.26.255  Mask:255.255.255.224
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:6610390 errors:0 dropped:398 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:15539649 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:437374052 (417.1 MiB)  TX bytes:23085830663 (21.5 GiB)

vlan4     Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr C0:56:27:06:39:FD 
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:675732 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:3808117 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:49359100 (47.0 MiB)  TX bytes:5558503781 (5.1 GiB)

root@----:~# nvram get DD_BOARD
Linksys EA8500
root@----:~# cat /tmp/loginprompt
DD-WRT v3.0-r37490M kongat (c) 2018 NewMedia-NET GmbH
Release: 10/22/18
root@----:~# uptime
 21:03:51 up 1 day, 18:34,  load average: 0.04, 0.03, 0.00
root@----:~# date
Tue Oct 23 21:03:53 CDT 2018
jerrytouille
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 11 Dec 2015
Posts: 1301

PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2018 5:33    Post subject: Reply with quote
bushant wrote:
Netgear R7500v2
I switched to 37420 [10-21-18] K3.18 yesterday [uptime 1 day,2:08] to see if it was any better for my crappy internet and now this is showing many RX errors 0 TX errors all on ath1.1 almost no traffic there just her android.


I'm using the official 10/19 k3.18 on Kong repo so give that one a try
htismaqe
DD-WRT User


Joined: 05 Nov 2015
Posts: 471

PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2018 16:48    Post subject: Reply with quote
I've upgraded to r37490 but the release are coming out so quickly that I really haven't had time to test anything. In the course of 10 days, I went from 37015, through 37120 and 37420, to 37490 without any connectivity, latency, or other issues. I don't use QoS though. I am running YAMon.

Also, it seems the HTTPD errors may actually be decreasing in these newer releases but I'll have to do some more investigation to be sure.

_________________
Routing:.......Asus RT-AX88U (Asuswrt-Merlin 384.14)
Switching:....Netgear GS608_V3 & GS605_V4, TrendNet TEG-S82G & TEG-S50G
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next Display posts from previous:    Page 11 of 15
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DD-WRT Forum Forum Index -> Atheros WiSOC based Hardware All times are GMT

Navigation

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum