Follow back from revision 32170 and that's what's in this build.
I think this is getting to where I can pull my R9000 out of rotation.. run the house on the R8000 and try out these builds on a regular basis. _________________ Routers:
Netgear R8000 - DD-WRT v3.0-r43420 std (06/15/20)
Netgear R9000 - DD-WRT v3.0-r43420 std (06/15/20)
Follow back from revision 32170 and that's what's in this build.
I think this is getting to where I can pull my R9000 out of rotation.. run the house on the R8000 and try out these builds on a regular basis.
What's wrong with this builds that you cannot use R9000 as a main one?
Speaking from experience I don't typically use the first rollouts of dd-wrt on a router that I need as my 'daily use' router. I fought with the R8000 builds for a long time before I found one that really worked and stayed solid. That version is the one I mention in my sig (R30880). I've tried moving to newer versions but I can't configure the virtual interfaces and VPN policies with the newer ones like I can with that version so I stay there. _________________ Routers:
Netgear R8000 - DD-WRT v3.0-r43420 std (06/15/20)
Netgear R9000 - DD-WRT v3.0-r43420 std (06/15/20)
Would anyone happen to know how to overclock this beast i'm curious to how far it could be pushed. Would overclocking do anything for vpn speeds or wifi? What would be the benefits if any to overclocking this beast?
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 5:23 Post subject: Re: OC
Johnnyde94 wrote:
Would anyone happen to know how to overclock this beast i'm curious to how far it could be pushed. Would overclocking do anything for vpn speeds or wifi? What would be the benefits if any to overclocking this beast?
Which VPN speeds are you hoping to achieve?
I am maxing out my 100/20 Mbps connection on R9000 with 150ms latency to VPN server. In comparison my RT-AC68U with 800Mhz CPU can only do 45Mbps with the same latency. However with latency of 5ms I am pushing RT-AC68U for 111/45 Mbps on a different internet internconnection (200/45), which I am unable to test R9000 right now.
So it all depends on two factors in my experience: latency & CPU clock.
Joined: 06 Jun 2006 Posts: 7608 Location: Dresden, Germany
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2017 10:05 Post subject:
pre release for testing. i changed alot within the embedded webserver. i hope there are no crashbugs within it. but overall it should be faster than ever before _________________ "So you tried to use the computer and it started smoking? Sounds like a Mac to me.." - Louis Rossmann https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eL_5YDRWqGE&t=60s
pre release for testing. i changed alot within the embedded webserver. i hope there are no crashbugs within it. but overall it should be faster than ever before
Cool thanks? You wouldn't be able to add overlooking or a way to increase tx power above 30? Do you know ssh commands to do ether?
Joined: 06 Jun 2006 Posts: 7608 Location: Dresden, Germany
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2017 19:28 Post subject:
i dont want to play with overclocking on a 1.8 ghz quad core cpu. i dont know the real limits yet. and for the qca chipset, its hard to run it with over limits without destroying it. it gets already hot from the default settings. so yes its possible, but not with ssh, you have to modify the calibration data _________________ "So you tried to use the computer and it started smoking? Sounds like a Mac to me.." - Louis Rossmann https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eL_5YDRWqGE&t=60s
i dont want to play with overclocking on a 1.8 ghz quad core cpu. i dont know the real limits yet. and for the qca chipset, its hard to run it with over limits without destroying it. it gets already hot from the default settings. so yes its possible, but not with ssh, you have to modify the calibration data
Would there be any advantages gained by doing this? I have a large fan and a protection plan. Would there at least be away to get above 30tx power? Im not near a big city to I don't think running that high would cause any reparations.
How would one modify said calibration data? Im thinking at starting at 1.9mhz and a increase to ram and bus speeds once I find out what that is.
Any way to make a build for GT-AC 5300 because the default firmware is shit but the hardware has potential. Thankks master slayer
pre release for testing. i changed alot within the embedded webserver. i hope there are no crashbugs within it. but overall it should be faster than ever before
Just tried the firmware will test out vpn speeds now. Any vpn server you like?
Joined: 03 Jan 2010 Posts: 7578 Location: YWG, Canada
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2017 22:00 Post subject:
BrainSlayer wrote:
i dont want to play with overclocking on a 1.8 ghz quad core cpu. i dont know the real limits yet. and for the qca chipset, its hard to run it with over limits without destroying it. it gets already hot from the default settings. so yes its possible, but not with ssh, you have to modify the calibration data
how about the ipq806x overclocking? or any qca overclocking really (i know ar93xx, qca955x can be oc'd). would they be easier cause of less cores?
and what do u mean the chipset runs hot? the 9984 in my r7800 only gets to around 50c under load (866/866mbps ac) _________________ LATEST FIRMWARE(S)
BrainSlayer wrote:
we just do it since we do not like any restrictions enforced by stupid cocaine snorting managers
i dont want to play with overclocking on a 1.8 ghz quad core cpu. i dont know the real limits yet. and for the qca chipset, its hard to run it with over limits without destroying it. it gets already hot from the default settings. so yes its possible, but not with ssh, you have to modify the calibration data
Right now my router is running at 30c so overheating is not a issue when overclocking.
pre release for testing. i changed alot within the embedded webserver. i hope there are no crashbugs within it. but overall it should be faster than ever before
I tried 3 VPN services and none seem to work with this build:(