New build: DD-WRT v3.0 --- 27506 --- 07/09/2015

Post new topic   Reply to topic    DD-WRT Forum Index -> Atheros WiSOC based Hardware
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 12, 13, 14, 15  Next
Author Message
tatsuya46
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Posts: 7568
Location: YWG, Canada

PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2015 9:15    Post subject: Reply with quote
Jack82 wrote:
tatsuya46 wrote:
Jack82 wrote:
Regarding tatsuya's recommendation in the dd-wrt wiki, for TX Power: "Recommended Setting: Highest dBm your radios/regulatory domain support"... well that's some really bad advice.... fry your brains people and don't worry...

The DD-WRT wiki can be edited by anyone and there's a lot of anecdotal evidence/recommendations there, e.g. the recommended TX Power. I wouldn't follow it. Some time ago it wasn't like that, but tatsuya changed the info, maybe because he believes it to be true ? I can't find any proof for this kind of info being correct. On the contrary...


cause it doesnt break ur router, or give u cancer, or whatever other myths there is around it.

Do you have any real proof for this affirmation ? Or should I take your word for it ? Because I won't.

tatsuya46 wrote:
30dbm if u have a router that can get that high is 1, one, watt that bleeds off extremely fast with every milimeter of distance, let alone being multiple feet from it, in a chassis & wifi doesnt even transmit constantly. ur fine. meanwhile microwaves are hundreds/thousands of watts & people are frequently closer to those mostly metallic enclosed devices

In your line of thought which doesn't seem to be more than imagination, if the router transmits from a chassis, that's supposed to help with lowering the microwave radiation?? am I missing something?
The microwave ovens are ENCLOSED devices (a sort of Faraday cage), that's what you completely disregard in your thinking. Their external leakage is extremely reduced. On the other hand, a router emits all that power in the form of radiation energy into the surroundings because that's what it's supposed to do. 1 W of micro waves being continuously emitted close to your body is a lot - that's not a myth.

Until you bring some serious proof showing that high TX Power is not detrimental to human health in any way, until then I won't believe your anecdotes. 'til then you should not "recommend" people to set TX Power at the maximum value. That's just crazy. The default 20 dBm (= 0.1 W) is there for a reason (and it's not 30 dBm or 36 dBm either). It was set to that specific, normal value by the devs, not by you. Until I see proof stating otherwise, I'd rather keep my settings closer to their default values and not yours.

Not to sound preachy... I know everybody is free to set their own TX Power as they wish. However, a warning doesn't do any wrong.


i dont care what u use, so use default then, or 10dbm, or 4. the same can be said to u for "proof" ONE, watt of tx power, assuming u have a router that can even use that, is "killing our brains"/our health in general. u believe & recommend what u want, & ill do the same.

guess the government is wrong & theyre killing us by saying its legal, so are cellular companies with their towers, society with our nuclear power plants, & the universe constantly bathing the planet in radiation (our sun too).

so i guess agree to disagree. kind of similar like those who try to be "health nuts" that point at u if u eat a cheeseburger, saying how healthy they eat, yet smoke cigarettes.

_________________
LATEST FIRMWARE(S)

BrainSlayer wrote:
we just do it since we do not like any restrictions enforced by stupid cocaine snorting managers

[x86_64] Haswell i3-4150/QCA9984/QCA9882 ------> r55797 std
[QUALCOMM] DIR-862L --------------------------------> r55797 std
▲ ACTIVE / INACTIVE ▼
[QUALCOMM] WNDR4300 v1 --------------------------> r50485 std
[BROADCOM] DIR-860L A1 ----------------------------> r50485 std


Sigh.. why do i exist anyway.. | I love you Anthony.. never forget that.. my other 99% that ill never see again..

Sponsor
Jack82
DD-WRT User


Joined: 26 Jan 2015
Posts: 229

PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2015 9:46    Post subject: Reply with quote
I figured you didn't have any proof for recommending maximum TX Power to everybody. The rest of your response is blabla.
tatsuya46
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Posts: 7568
Location: YWG, Canada

PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2015 9:52    Post subject: Reply with quote
no blabla in ur response whatsoever right. so u are one of those health nuts that sees everything as "unhealthy", acknowledged, each to their own beliefs
_________________
LATEST FIRMWARE(S)

BrainSlayer wrote:
we just do it since we do not like any restrictions enforced by stupid cocaine snorting managers

[x86_64] Haswell i3-4150/QCA9984/QCA9882 ------> r55797 std
[QUALCOMM] DIR-862L --------------------------------> r55797 std
▲ ACTIVE / INACTIVE ▼
[QUALCOMM] WNDR4300 v1 --------------------------> r50485 std
[BROADCOM] DIR-860L A1 ----------------------------> r50485 std


Sigh.. why do i exist anyway.. | I love you Anthony.. never forget that.. my other 99% that ill never see again..

Jack82
DD-WRT User


Joined: 26 Jan 2015
Posts: 229

PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:14    Post subject: Reply with quote
Here's some reading for you tatsuya
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/threads/is-wifi-dangerous.349622/#post-2248955
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1549944/Warning-on-wi-fi-health-risk-to-children.html
http://www.globalhealingcenter.com/natural-health/10-shocking-facts-health-dangers-wifi/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_electronic_devices_and_health
Will you still "recommend" that I disregard all of the above and follow your max TX Power "recommendation" instead ?
tatsuya46
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Posts: 7568
Location: YWG, Canada

PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:21    Post subject: Reply with quote
yes i do, u linked a forum, a wiki & articles none are the best forms of creditable info similar to what u said for my wiki entry about wikis being editable. a little surprised u even use wifi if u think its killing u.

each to their own beliefs, which is like religion, having none of it, ill just nod

_________________
LATEST FIRMWARE(S)

BrainSlayer wrote:
we just do it since we do not like any restrictions enforced by stupid cocaine snorting managers

[x86_64] Haswell i3-4150/QCA9984/QCA9882 ------> r55797 std
[QUALCOMM] DIR-862L --------------------------------> r55797 std
▲ ACTIVE / INACTIVE ▼
[QUALCOMM] WNDR4300 v1 --------------------------> r50485 std
[BROADCOM] DIR-860L A1 ----------------------------> r50485 std


Sigh.. why do i exist anyway.. | I love you Anthony.. never forget that.. my other 99% that ill never see again..

Jack82
DD-WRT User


Joined: 26 Jan 2015
Posts: 229

PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:30    Post subject: Reply with quote
Obviously you didn't even check the articles, let alone the references therein. This one has some good scientific evidence http://www.globalhealingcenter.com/natural-health/10-shocking-facts-health-dangers-wifi/

This will be my last reply to you tatsuya. You just continue giving dangerous recommendations to users via the wiki.
ph03n!x
DD-WRT User


Joined: 28 Jan 2015
Posts: 50

PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2015 11:35    Post subject: Reply with quote
Jack82 wrote:
Obviously you didn't even check the articles, let alone the references therein. This one has some good scientific evidence http://www.globalhealingcenter.com/natural-health/10-shocking-facts-health-dangers-wifi/

This will be my last reply to you tatsuya. You just continue giving dangerous recommendations to users via the wiki.


Here's the FCC approval for the my router, the WNDR3700v4 - https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/GenericSearchResult.cfm?RequestTimeout=500

It has been approved for 25+ dBm TX Power. Note that there is no way to make it transmit much more than that - whatever you set beyond the hardware capability will be ignored.

Now, if FCC approves something for use, I am going to presume it is reasonably safe for use. They may be proved wrong and may change the specifications tomorrow - but for today, we gotta go by them. Or, you know, unplug completely - no phones, no computers, no TV, no DTH, nothing electronic or artificial, and go back to the cave.

I am not too worried about dying coz of all these electronics a few years earlier. Not really interested in living a 100, or even beyond 65 Very Happy

If anyone's too worried about your health vs. what mods you do by reading up this forum and the internet, keep stock. Or unplug.
YaddaMinski
DD-WRT User


Joined: 24 Oct 2010
Posts: 294

PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2015 15:54    Post subject: Reply with quote
Router: TP Link TL-WR842ND v2
Firmware: DD-WRT v3.0-r27506 (07/09/15) std
Kernel: Linux 3.10.83 #5716 Thu Jul 9
Status: Working
Reset: No
Errors: None so far. Audio streaming dropouts that occurred with 4/1/15 build seem fixed!
YaddaMinski
DD-WRT User


Joined: 24 Oct 2010
Posts: 294

PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2015 15:57    Post subject: Reply with quote
Router: TP Link TL-WR841N v9.1
Firmware: DD-WRT v3.0-r27506 (07/09/15) std
Kernel: Linux 3.18.17 #3481 Thu Jul 9
Status: Working
Reset: No
Errors: None so far.

Used as a switch only, WiFi disabled.
bdg2
DD-WRT User


Joined: 18 Apr 2013
Posts: 319

PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2015 16:52    Post subject: Reply with quote
YaddaMinski wrote:
Router: TP Link TL-WR841N v9.1
Firmware: DD-WRT v3.0-r27506 (07/09/15) std
Kernel: Linux 3.18.17 #3481 Thu Jul 9
Status: Working
Reset: No
Errors: None so far.

Used as a switch only, WiFi disabled.


But it'd probably work as a switch without any firmware at all.
SaintMaybe
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 09 Aug 2015
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2015 19:06    Post subject: Re: Why can I see no new updates past '07/09/2015 02:54PM' Reply with quote
Zerion wrote:
SaintMaybe wrote:
Hello,
I'm not using a Proxy, and this is on every computer in my household. Is there a new web-site now instead of 'ftp://ftp.dd-wrt.com/betas/2015' to download newer firmwares?
Regards.


Here:
https://www.dd-wrt.com/site/support/other-downloads

I couldn't download from the ftp as well.


Thanks, Zerion, but that page ends at July 9th, for me as well ... or should I no longer be looking under 'Downloads/betas/2015'?
tatsuya46
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Posts: 7568
Location: YWG, Canada

PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2015 19:12    Post subject: Re: Why can I see no new updates past '07/09/2015 02:54PM' Reply with quote
SaintMaybe wrote:
Zerion wrote:
SaintMaybe wrote:
Hello,
I'm not using a Proxy, and this is on every computer in my household. Is there a new web-site now instead of 'ftp://ftp.dd-wrt.com/betas/2015' to download newer firmwares?
Regards.


Here:
https://www.dd-wrt.com/site/support/other-downloads

I couldn't download from the ftp as well.


Thanks, Zerion, but that page ends at July 9th, for me as well ... or should I no longer be looking under 'Downloads/betas/2015'?


because thats the latest public release..

_________________
LATEST FIRMWARE(S)

BrainSlayer wrote:
we just do it since we do not like any restrictions enforced by stupid cocaine snorting managers

[x86_64] Haswell i3-4150/QCA9984/QCA9882 ------> r55797 std
[QUALCOMM] DIR-862L --------------------------------> r55797 std
▲ ACTIVE / INACTIVE ▼
[QUALCOMM] WNDR4300 v1 --------------------------> r50485 std
[BROADCOM] DIR-860L A1 ----------------------------> r50485 std


Sigh.. why do i exist anyway.. | I love you Anthony.. never forget that.. my other 99% that ill never see again..

Molle
DD-WRT User


Joined: 13 Jan 2015
Posts: 127
Location: Finland

PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 14:00    Post subject: Reply with quote
Router: D-Link DIR-825 B2
Firmware: DD-WRT v3.0-r27506 (07/09/15) std
Kernel: Linux 3.10.83 #5656 Thu Jul 9 01:44:18 CEST 2015 mips
Status: OK
Reset: No
Errors: None

Two identical routers (AP & Client Bridge), updated from r27456.
rseiler
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 01 Oct 2007
Posts: 622

PostPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2015 6:01    Post subject: Reply with quote
Does QoS work on this build? I updated a Broadcom router with this build, and QoS doesn't appear to have any impact on bandwidth at all, as if it's not running (though it is).

Before I flash my Atheros box, I'd just like to know if there's some known QoS issue in recent builds, this one in particular.
tatsuya46
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Posts: 7568
Location: YWG, Canada

PostPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2015 6:12    Post subject: Reply with quote
it works fine
_________________
LATEST FIRMWARE(S)

BrainSlayer wrote:
we just do it since we do not like any restrictions enforced by stupid cocaine snorting managers

[x86_64] Haswell i3-4150/QCA9984/QCA9882 ------> r55797 std
[QUALCOMM] DIR-862L --------------------------------> r55797 std
▲ ACTIVE / INACTIVE ▼
[QUALCOMM] WNDR4300 v1 --------------------------> r50485 std
[BROADCOM] DIR-860L A1 ----------------------------> r50485 std


Sigh.. why do i exist anyway.. | I love you Anthony.. never forget that.. my other 99% that ill never see again..

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 12, 13, 14, 15  Next Display posts from previous:    Page 13 of 15
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DD-WRT Forum Index -> Atheros WiSOC based Hardware All times are GMT

Navigation

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum