Joined: 16 Nov 2015 Posts: 4089 Location: UK, London, just across the river..
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 15:57 Post subject:
as Turris Omnia is a private project i really doubt they will leave the door open for other 3 rd party router software to take advantage of their hardware...
In general their idea is to create a quite versatile and unique router as well there is a new approach in router's firmware update process, very different from the other routers on the market...
P.S. "XTC0r" what is wrong with their stock firmware that you want DD-WRT on it ?? _________________ Atheros
TP-Link WR740Nv1 -----DD-WRT 44538 BS AP,NAT
TP-Link WR740Nv4 -----DD-WRT 44251 BS WAP/Switch
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 ---DD-WRT 45229 BS AP,NAT,AP Isolation,Firewall,Local DNS,Forced DNS,DoT,VPN,VLAN
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 ---DD-WRT 44849 BS AP,NAT,AD Block,Firewall,Local DNS,Forced DNS,DoT,VPN,VLAN
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 ---Gargoyle OS 1.12.0 AP,NAT,QoS,Quotas
Qualcomm/IPQ8065
Netgear R7800 -----DD-WRT 44719 BS AP,NAT,AD-Block,AP&Net Isolation,VLAN's,Firewall,Local DNS,DoT
Broadcom
Netgear R7000 -----DD-WRT 45420 BS AP,Wi-Fi OFF,NAT,AD-Block,Firewall,Local DNS,Forced DNS,DoT,VPN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stubby for DNS over TLS I DNSCrypt v2 by mac913
P.S. "XTC0r" what is wrong with their stock firmware that you want DD-WRT on it ??
The interface is dog sh%t and DNS resolving doesn't work. Did anybody get DD-WRT working on it? ...and yes it completely open source. I asked them if other builds would work and they said there was certainly nothing stopping it.
Joined: 16 Nov 2015 Posts: 4089 Location: UK, London, just across the river..
Posted: Sat Nov 04, 2017 19:12 Post subject:
well, at first glance T.O. looked with great specs and promising future, however it seems its a another dumb project with shiny marketing and fat price...
if DD-WRT porting is possible someone has to donate unit for porting but its price is still too dear....
i just saw a short clip with its interface and it looked very basic to me its a shame ppl already complain form it and it will be great to see it under DD-WRT's hat... so someone has to do the first step.... _________________ Atheros
TP-Link WR740Nv1 -----DD-WRT 44538 BS AP,NAT
TP-Link WR740Nv4 -----DD-WRT 44251 BS WAP/Switch
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 ---DD-WRT 45229 BS AP,NAT,AP Isolation,Firewall,Local DNS,Forced DNS,DoT,VPN,VLAN
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 ---DD-WRT 44849 BS AP,NAT,AD Block,Firewall,Local DNS,Forced DNS,DoT,VPN,VLAN
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 ---Gargoyle OS 1.12.0 AP,NAT,QoS,Quotas
Qualcomm/IPQ8065
Netgear R7800 -----DD-WRT 44719 BS AP,NAT,AD-Block,AP&Net Isolation,VLAN's,Firewall,Local DNS,DoT
Broadcom
Netgear R7000 -----DD-WRT 45420 BS AP,Wi-Fi OFF,NAT,AD-Block,Firewall,Local DNS,Forced DNS,DoT,VPN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stubby for DNS over TLS I DNSCrypt v2 by mac913
Joined: 16 Nov 2015 Posts: 4089 Location: UK, London, just across the river..
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2020 18:29 Post subject:
Gargoyle supports T.Om. too...its a main favourable replacement, so far...
But, it will be great if BS does DDWRT for it too...
it may become favourable thing...
I missed to buy one, still looking for it....just for the fun of it...
(now scouting for a cheap R9000).. _________________ Atheros
TP-Link WR740Nv1 -----DD-WRT 44538 BS AP,NAT
TP-Link WR740Nv4 -----DD-WRT 44251 BS WAP/Switch
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 ---DD-WRT 45229 BS AP,NAT,AP Isolation,Firewall,Local DNS,Forced DNS,DoT,VPN,VLAN
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 ---DD-WRT 44849 BS AP,NAT,AD Block,Firewall,Local DNS,Forced DNS,DoT,VPN,VLAN
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 ---Gargoyle OS 1.12.0 AP,NAT,QoS,Quotas
Qualcomm/IPQ8065
Netgear R7800 -----DD-WRT 44719 BS AP,NAT,AD-Block,AP&Net Isolation,VLAN's,Firewall,Local DNS,DoT
Broadcom
Netgear R7000 -----DD-WRT 45420 BS AP,Wi-Fi OFF,NAT,AD-Block,Firewall,Local DNS,Forced DNS,DoT,VPN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stubby for DNS over TLS I DNSCrypt v2 by mac913
Joined: 08 May 2018 Posts: 7610 Location: Texas, USA
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 18:39 Post subject:
Quote:
i was working on this device. the problem is just that they made alot of driver and ethernet hacks which would make everything incompatible to the wrt1900ac series
