Joined: 03 Jan 2007 Posts: 76 Location: Sweden, Stockholm
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 18:09 Post subject: WRT320N, Extra Cooling/Heat Sink, Case Mod
Today I decided to increase the cooling of the WRT320Ns CPU while at the same time trying to keep the routers good looks and the function of it's protective cover.
I found a couple of heat sinks at home that are about the same size as the CPU chip. I basically cut out a hole in the center of the top cover matching the location of the CPU (exactly in the center of the router) and the size of the heat sink. (I removed the cover first of course )
The heat sinks I found wore all black anodized aluminum, so on one of them I removed the black color in order to find out what looks best. Now I can't make up my mind... the black one or the shiny one? (before I permanently glue it to the CPU) :roll:
Sorry of the quality isn't that good, taken with my cell phone.
Joined: 03 Jan 2007 Posts: 76 Location: Sweden, Stockholm
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 15:17 Post subject:
I added the Black heatsink today and are now running clkfreq=480,240,120. The heatsink is approx. 50-60 degrees Celsius by touch (need new batterys to my IR-thermometer)
I used a very small amount of ordinary Epoxy to fasten it. For applications like this, there is no need for thermaly conductive glue. Since the thermal resistance of such a small heatsink without a fan, is quite high compared to the thin layer of ordinary glue.
Strange thing though; BogoMIPS shows 239.20 at both 480 Mhz and 453 Mhz. Can one trust BogoMIPS or is it true that 480 MHz isn't faster than 453 MHz?
For the record, I stepped up the overclocking from the default to 480 Mhz in these steps: 480/240, 453/226, 400/200 and 354/177. Every time benchmarking the WAN to LAN throughput, which increased approximately by the same percentage as the overclocking. _________________ WRT320N
I added the Black heatsink today and are now running clkfreq=480,240,120. The heatsink is approx. 50-60 degrees Celsius by touch (need new batterys to my IR-thermometer)
I used a very small amount of ordinary Epoxy to fasten it. For applications like this, there is no need for thermaly conductive glue. Since the thermal resistance of such a small heatsink without a fan, is quite high compared to the thin layer of ordinary glue.
Strange thing though; BogoMIPS shows 239.20 at both 480 Mhz and 453 Mhz. Can one trust BogoMIPS or is it true that 480 MHz isn't faster than 453 MHz?
For the record, I stepped up the overclocking from the default to 480 Mhz in these steps: 480/240, 453/226, 400/200 and 354/177. Every time benchmarking the WAN to LAN throughput, which increased approximately by the same percentage as the overclocking.
Did you saw a WAN to LAN throughput increase from
453 Mhz to 480Mhz?
If it increase, than i think BogoMIPS is not really to trust i think.
Setting the WRT320N too 453/226 will also send it to 480/240. You'll end up with the same clock speed. I've been running 480/240/120 here for quite some time with no extra heatsink (also stressed it in a lab environment). It's rock solid. _________________ 1 x WRT310Nv2 (400/200/100)
3 x WRT320N (480/240/120)
1 x E4200 (532/266/133)
(All running the latest DD-WRT!)
Joined: 03 Jan 2007 Posts: 76 Location: Sweden, Stockholm
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 11:38 Post subject:
LiteUp! wrote:
Setting the WRT320N too 453/226 will also send it to 480/240. You'll end up with the same clock speed. I've been running 480/240/120 here for quite some time with no extra heatsink (also stressed it in a lab environment). It's rock solid.
That is a great graph! :)
Although I do not get those speeds here, I have trouble getting over 90 Mbit/s, which is bad since I have 100 Mbit internet connection. (Maybe due to other processes running on the router, such as OpenVPN etc.)
Also you are sure that 453,226 isn't a valid speed? _________________ WRT320N
Setting the WRT320N too 453/226 will also send it to 480/240. You'll end up with the same clock speed. I've been running 480/240/120 here for quite some time with no extra heatsink (also stressed it in a lab environment). It's rock solid.
That is a great graph! :)
Although I do not get those speeds here, I have trouble getting over 90 Mbit/s, which is bad since I have 100 Mbit internet connection. (Maybe due to other processes running on the router, such as OpenVPN etc.)
Also you are sure that 453,226 isn't a valid speed?
Yes, I am sure. _________________ 1 x WRT310Nv2 (400/200/100)
3 x WRT320N (480/240/120)
1 x E4200 (532/266/133)
(All running the latest DD-WRT!)
Joined: 03 Jan 2007 Posts: 76 Location: Sweden, Stockholm
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 19:37 Post subject:
I have experienced some random reboots since I overclocked it to 480.. temporarily I downclocked to 400,200 since I will be going away for a couple of days and need the router (OpenVPN etc.) to be operational.
I'm not sure the overclocking was the source of the problem, but downclocking solved the problem. _________________ WRT320N
I have experienced some random reboots since I overclocked it to 480.. temporarily I downclocked to 400,200 since I will be going away for a couple of days and need the router (OpenVPN etc.) to be operational.
I'm not sure the overclocking was the source of the problem, but downclocking solved the problem.
Strange,
a few friends of mine also has the WRT320 router with latest DD-WRT on it and all units also runs fine on 480Mhz.
from the 6 WRT320N units only mine got the heatsinks, the second next week.
All do run fine @480Mhz.
Joined: 03 Jan 2007 Posts: 76 Location: Sweden, Stockholm
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 23:41 Post subject:
Dutchman01 wrote:
ev1te wrote:
I have experienced some random reboots since I overclocked it to 480.. temporarily I downclocked to 400,200 since I will be going away for a couple of days and need the router (OpenVPN etc.) to be operational.
I'm not sure the overclocking was the source of the problem, but downclocking solved the problem.
Strange,
a few friends of mine also has the WRT320 router with latest DD-WRT on it and all units also runs fine on 480Mhz.
from the 6 WRT320N units only mine got the heatsinks, the second next week.
All do run fine @480Mhz.
I am now back again after my business trip. So once again I have increased the overclocking to 480,240,120 in order to analyze the performance and stability of the router.
Which logs every reboot of the router, current date/time, current frequency, time to boot and load averages for that time (decreases by 50% at 480 compared to 400). _________________ WRT320N
Joined: 03 Jan 2007 Posts: 76 Location: Sweden, Stockholm
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 22:59 Post subject:
Just a small update, I have been running the router on 480/240 Mhz for several weeks now, without any reboots or instabilities. _________________ WRT320N
Here is my cooling mod. I have the router from 5-6 months, but can't stand any more, so brake the warranty, open the router and fix 2 cooper heat sinks from, a video card cooler. I overclock the CPU from 354 MHZ to 400 MHZ and it's stable. I want to ask how to clock and the memory (Hynics) ? My Chip is Broadcom BCM4716 chip rev 1 - how much is the max clock of it and how much is the default ? Also the memory ?
EDIT: Does anybody know how i can see how many i clock my router, because in dd-wrt i see only the CPU speed, what about the DDR and the other last thing ??? Thanks
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 7401 Location: Little Rock
Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 18:11 Post subject:
ka4o_pi4a wrote:
Here is my cooling mod. I have the router from 5-6 months, but can't stand any more, so brake the warranty, open the router and fix 2 cooper heat sinks from, a video card cooler. I overclock the CPU from 354 MHZ to 400 MHZ and it's stable. I want to ask how to clock and the memory (Hynics) ? My Chip is Broadcom BCM4716 chip rev 1 - how much is the max clock of it and how much is the default ? Also the memory ?
EDIT: Does anybody know how i can see how many i clock my router, because in dd-wrt i see only the CPU speed, what about the DDR and the other last thing ??? Thanks
Looks good, also if your talking about overclocking it, that info is in the wiki.
Hi
My Micromark drinks cooler has stopped its cooling effect. It's the type that has a fan on the back and a heat sink assembly, with a little printed circuit board, that provides the cooling effect. It used to get quite cold, and at one time there was even ice forming at the back on the inside, but now it has stopped and even gets warm.
_________________