Using R7800 on City Fibre Vodafone 900

Post new topic   Reply to topic    DD-WRT Forum Index -> Atheros WiSOC based Hardware
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
ho1Aetoo
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 19 Feb 2019
Posts: 2927
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 18:33    Post subject: Reply with quote
scope2 wrote:

I have made the required changes now (I think):

Switch Config Disabled:


Interface Setup:


Commands In Startup:


VLAN Output:


WAN Status:


But as you can see from the last screenshot I still have no connection.

I must be missing something? I feel I am close but missing the final bit. Smile

@ho1Aetoo: I am slightly confused with the last comment you said.. Should I expect this to work, or are you saying it wont work?

Thanks for the help guys, I appreciate it.


Yes right, that's how it has to work.
But on page 1 of the thread you used a different VLAN ID.

(I am also sure that it works like this, because I tested it just now (I have PPPoE myself and my ISP needs a VLAN ID).

If you are interested, Brainslayer is building an image for me with the fix for the GUI.
Sponsor
scope2
DD-WRT User


Joined: 12 Jul 2017
Posts: 181

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 18:38    Post subject: Reply with quote
OK, another followup..

I have a VAP on a saparate bridge on this router:



The talk of eth0 got me thinking, and I can see br1 has been assigned to eth0..

To test I removed this bridge so I ended up with:



Networking is not my day job, so I might have done something wrong by assigning br1 to eth0, but prior to me removing the VAP worked.. (I suspect if I tested it now it wouldnt, but that will end up being my next task).

The good news is, now I am able to get an WAN IP and have internet access..

Should the above change result in this starting to work?
ho1Aetoo
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 19 Feb 2019
Posts: 2927
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 18:40    Post subject: Reply with quote
Yes exactly the WAN port eth0 must of course be unbridged (it is by default)
scope2
DD-WRT User


Joined: 12 Jul 2017
Posts: 181

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 18:41    Post subject: Reply with quote
ho1Aetoo wrote:

But on page 1 of the thread you used a different VLAN ID.


Yes, I initially thought it was VLAN 101, the ISP later told me it was 911..
scope2
DD-WRT User


Joined: 12 Jul 2017
Posts: 181

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 18:48    Post subject: Reply with quote
ho1Aetoo wrote:
Yes exactly the WAN port eth0 must of course be unbridged (it is by default)


Great that clears that up then. Smile

Am I right in thinking I should assign wlan0.1 (the WIFI I intended to be on this bridge) to br1 to ensure all devices on that WIFI ends up on the br1.
ho1Aetoo
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 19 Feb 2019
Posts: 2927
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 19:25    Post subject: Reply with quote
Well, about the VAP, why do you want it bridged anyway?

Either you leave the VAPs bridged with br0, but then you have no isolation.
Or use unbridged VAPs then each VAP needs its own subnet.
Or you bridge several VAPs to a new bridge then the VAPs have only one new subnet.

I can't answer that if you don't tell me exactly what you want to do.

Regarding the "switch config tab" the tagging is fixed in build r52088.
I just tested this extensively and you see I have an internet connection

If you want I can send you the build via PM if you still want to test it.
scope2
DD-WRT User


Joined: 12 Jul 2017
Posts: 181

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 19:35    Post subject: Reply with quote
ho1Aetoo wrote:
Well, about the VAP, why do you want it bridged anyway?

Either you leave the VAPs bridged with br0, but then you have no isolation.
Or use unbridged VAPs then each VAP needs its own subnet.
Or you bridge several VAPs to a new bridge then the VAPs have only one new subnet.

I can't answer that if you don't tell me exactly what you want to do.

Regarding the "switch config tab" the tagging is fixed in build r52088.
I just tested this extensively and you see I have an internet connection

If you want I can send you the build via PM if you still want to test it.


I need the VAP on a separate subnet as I use it to route all its traffic over a Wireguard tunnel using PBR.. I have a DHCP on this subnet to hand out IPs in a 192.168.2.X subnet rather than the main 192.168.0.X.

I now have this setup for BR1 and it seems to work fine on the VAP:



Please send me a link to the test version and I will test it if I get the chance.
ho1Aetoo
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 19 Feb 2019
Posts: 2927
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 19:42    Post subject: Reply with quote
scope2 wrote:
I need the VAP on a separate subnet as I use it to route all its traffic over a Wireguard tunnel using PBR.. I have a DHCP on this subnet to hand out IPs in a 192.168.2.X subnet rather than the main 192.168.0.X.

I now have this setup for BR1 and it seems to work fine on the VAP:



Please send me a link to the test version and I will test it if I get the chance.


Yes, this works but is certainly not necessary.
You can also simply set the VAP to unbridged then you can also directly assign a different address to the VAP interface.

The build r52088 is in your PM box.
scope2
DD-WRT User


Joined: 12 Jul 2017
Posts: 181

PostPosted: Fri Mar 24, 2023 19:53    Post subject: Reply with quote
For those of you with R7800 and PPPoe, what kind of speeds should i be getting with and without SFE enabled?

I'm only 600ish without SFE, and 950 with it enabled, is that about correct?
Alozaros
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 6407
Location: UK, London, just across the river..

PostPosted: Fri Mar 24, 2023 20:08    Post subject: Reply with quote
in general pppoe is taxing the CPU and its normal to have lower speed...SFE is only accelerating
the NAT performance..so its kind a hole in the NAT ...my R7800 tested with Kong build ages ago was able to translate around 900Mbit+ over static IP haven't tested it ever since...but over PPPoE it will be slower..if you also have other services that tax the CPU, no wonder why speed is reduced...

As Brain Slayer is bringing the unicorns around, it would be another miracle if he makes a build utilizing the R7800 NSS spare cores Razz ... Embarassed

_________________
Atheros
TP-Link WR740Nv1 ---DD-WRT 55179 WAP
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 -DD-WRT 55303 Gateway/DoT,Forced DNS,Ad-Block,Firewall,x4VLAN,VPN
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 -Gargoyle OS 1.15.x AP,DNS,QoS,Quotas
Qualcomm-Atheros
Netgear XR500 --DD-WRT 55460 Gateway/DoH,Forced DNS,AP Isolation,4VLAN,Ad-Block,Firewall,Vanilla
Netgear R7800 --DD-WRT 55460 Gateway/DoT,AD-Block,Forced DNS,AP&Net Isolation,x3VLAN,Firewall,Vanilla
Netgear R9000 --DD-WRT 55363 Gateway/DoT,AD-Block,AP Isolation,Firewall,Forced DNS,x2VLAN,Vanilla
Broadcom
Netgear R7000 --DD-WRT 55460 Gateway/SmartDNS/DoH,AD-Block,Firewall,Forced DNS,x3VLAN,VPN
NOT USING 5Ghz ANYWHERE
------------------------------------------------------
Stubby DNS over TLS I DNSCrypt v2 by mac913
Per Yngve Berg
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 13 Aug 2013
Posts: 6856
Location: Romerike, Norway

PostPosted: Fri Mar 24, 2023 21:51    Post subject: Reply with quote
You may Gain something by moving the task to the other Core if they are unbalanced.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 Display posts from previous:    Page 3 of 3
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DD-WRT Forum Index -> Atheros WiSOC based Hardware All times are GMT

Navigation

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum