[tgvrfcedx]

some older versions of firmware are

webflash 3mb and factory to ddwrt 3mb

but laster firmware is

webflash 3mb and factory to ddwrt 6mb

if the router is 4mb flash / 32ram

does that mean no version after the 3/3mb size will work?

or does it mean you must flash an older factory to ddwrt first 3mb and then use the laster firmware webflash to upgrade?

thanks

[egc]

You can better ask those questions in the appropriate forum, a lot of things things depend on router model

As you did not state your router model I can not transfer it for your.

We can give better support if you follow the forum guidelines e.g. always state router model

[tgvrfcedx]

its a general question for all routers
but if you want a model DLINK-615 E4

thanks

[kernel-panic69]

I already answered this question. I may not have gone into detail why the factory-to-ddwrt.bin files are the wrong size or satisfied your questions to your liking, but that is not important, is it? You are grinding an axe that is best left alone. You have been given more than enough information, I do not know how difficult it is to comprehend.

[tgvrfcedx]

that does not answer my questions... "WHY"
and if its SOOOO painful for you to help...DONT REPLY. easy!

why.... is 10-17-2017-r33525 the latest? size?

why are later versions 6mb if they are too large to flash?

is the correct way to upgrade the the latest version by webflash after first install ddwrt to get around size issue

in routrer search the highest version 44715 but in the directory its 09-08-2021-r47381 ?? why

[kernel-panic69]

I will email the developer and ask AGAIN. It wasn't important enough to fix it last time I inquired, obviously. I really don't know why you must continue to grind this axe. You have a known initial flash file. It's a known issue that is documented. I even updated the device wiki some and linked your other thread until I get a chance to do a proper update, just because YOU need it.

Please refer AGAIN to the forum rules and guidelines already linked; read, read, read, and COMPREHEND. The forum has NO control over development or the router database. NONE. It's stated numerous times throughout and yet you still have to ask WHY WHY WHY....

[tgvrfcedx]

fix what issue?
what is a known issue?
im not sure what you are even talking about anymore.

i am not able to create an account to update the wiki ..soo?

[d33b0_n4p41m]

We must have clear, clean, neat, and concise documentation. It is a must. Because people can't seem to use their brain and accept things as they are and move forward. We must stop the entire project and shut the shop doors because of one person. Ludicrous!

There is a reason why wiki access is locked down. Because too many boneheads have mucked things up. You're not sure what's going on because you spend too much time asking questions instead of taking what is there and moving forward. You are literally bikeshedding things here.

[kernel-panic69]

Your questions have already been answered. The answers may not have been obvious, but you were given answers, nonetheless.

EDIT: I got a response while I was napping. The answer to your question on the firmware size issue is what I suspected; The builds were broken. I will check the next release and update the status.

[servicetech]

[d33b0_n4p41m]

The developer was already contacted; thanks for the more level-headed explanation. Apparently, some folks need explanations for everything where the website and currently posted information are lacking due to gears grinding to a halt and they cannot seem to move forward in life until they're given an answer that correlates to "42". It also seems that we must white tornado the community over it as well. I am still waiting for the inputs for the wikis that have yet to be given; I thought all the information was already compiled and ready to go. Apparently not.