Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2020 15:33 Post subject: Netgear X10 r9000 issues
Upon loading this firmware version r41954 on my r9000, interface and device becomes non-responsive. Power-cycling successfully resets the device. Upon boot, it's still using the previous firmware version r41892.
Joined: 08 May 2018 Posts: 13898 Location: Texas, USA
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2020 15:42 Post subject:
Vitello wrote:
What exactly made you cringe about that, Kernel-panic69? What am I missing?
Makes me think of enabling NetBEUI and NetBIOS on Windows and exposing it to the world. I still need to do some research on it before I have a good feeling about it. _________________ "Life is but a fleeting moment, a vapor that vanishes quickly; All is vanity"
Contribute To DD-WRT Pogo - A minimal level of ability is expected and needed... DD-WRT Releases 2023 (PolitePol)
DD-WRT Releases 2023 (RSS Everything)
----------------------
Linux User #377467 counter.li.org / linuxcounter.net
Joined: 18 Mar 2014 Posts: 12487 Location: Netherlands
Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2020 15:02 Post subject:
I am talking about WAN<>LAN throughput, so router performing NAT.
If you keep the up_threshold at default 80 throughput is around 650 Mb/s
If you lower the up_threshold to 35 or 20 you can get 900 Mb/s.
I am not talking about wireless.
I did test wireless 160 Mhz with 1733 Mb/s. But I did not get more than 700 Mb/s effective throughput WLAN<>LAN, but that could well be that the laptop is the bottleneck. The wifi 6 chipset should do more but I do not know how it is connected internally _________________ Routers:Netgear R7000, R6400v1, R6400v2, EA6900 (XvortexCFE), E2000, E1200v1, WRT54GS v1.
Install guide R6400v2, R6700v3,XR300:https://forum.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=316399 Install guide R7800/XR500:https://forum.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=320614 Forum Guide Lines (important read):https://forum.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=324087
Joined: 16 Nov 2015 Posts: 6185 Location: UK, London, just across the river..
Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2020 17:19 Post subject:
ho1Aetoo wrote:
the WLAN/LAN routing performance of the R7800 is ~700mbit/sek
no further testing needed - the value is known
well with max CPU and some cores fiddling, using Kong firmware i managed to get up to 900-1000Mbit WAN to LAN in the past ...
the 900-1000 Mbit WAN performance value of R7800 is known....
haven't tested it now, I never had a chance to test that speed from my ISP, as i don't have it anymore...
performance also depends on settings, clients type/mode and ect. _________________ Atheros
TP-Link WR740Nv1 ---DD-WRT 53045 WAP
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 -DD-WRT 54420 Gateway/DoT,Forced DNS,AP Isolation,Ad-Block,Firewall,VPN,x1VLAN
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 -DD-WRT 54475 Gateway/DoT,Forced DNS,Ad-Block,Firewall,x4VLAN,VPN
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 -Gargoyle OS 1.15.x AP,DNS,QoS,Quotas
Qualcomm-Atheros
Netgear R7800 --DD-WRT 54475 Gateway/DoT,AD-Block,Forced DNS,AP&Net Isolation,x3VLAN,Firewall,Vanilla
Netgear R9000 --DD-WRT 54475 Gateway/DoT,AD-Block,AP Isolation,Firewall,Forced DNS,x2VLAN,Vanilla
Broadcom
Netgear R7000 --DD-WRT 54475 Gateway/SmartDNS/DoH,AD-Block,Firewall,Forced DNS,x3VLAN,VPN
NOT USING 5Ghz ANYWHERE
------------------------------------------------------
Stubby DNS over TLS I DNSCrypt v2 by mac913
the WLAN/LAN routing performance of the R7800 is ~700mbit/sek
no further testing needed - the value is known
With no CPU tweaks you’ll be stuck at 700mbps using the on demand governor. The default on demand up threshold is 95% (CPU default is 384 MHz, won’t turn up the frequency until the CPU is 95% in use!).
See for yourself with the on demand governor turned on:
The R7800 is capable of 800 to low 900 WAN => LAN with SFE turned on and the appropriate CPU settings.
Running the performance governor or setting the ondemand governor up threshold more aggressive consistently gives mid to high 800mbps. I’m personally running the following up threshold of 35% (similar to egc’s recommendation, lowers the threshold to turn the CPU frequency up to 1.7ghz on demand):
which isnt normal anyway, compare that to latest kong build, his has WAY less cpu. same as kong or BS k3.18 builds, but as usual BS doesnt believe k4.x broke ipq806x in multiple ways.. (including ondemand scaling, thresholds still dont fix it properly) _________________ LATEST FIRMWARE(S)
BrainSlayer wrote:
we just do it since we do not like any restrictions enforced by stupid cocaine snorting managers
Just a thought, when I started reading about the performance (CPU governor, core affinity etc) I noticed that that my interrupts and core affinity settings were different from the ones reported.
Maybe it is just updated and everyone else has the same settings but I post them here anyway for you to check.
Joined: 16 Nov 2015 Posts: 6185 Location: UK, London, just across the river..
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:59 Post subject:
well... egc, do you use any core lines in start up?
or this is plain output....??
How does max CPU settings affect this performance or you are using ondemand...???
I was using MAX CPU for a bit of a time, but i have some
cooling mods and extra thermal pads here and there in my R7800, so never had an overheating issue..with max CPU
Currently still using few CPU core lines to balance cores, and ondemand CPU with 35 threshold, but haven't seen the recent CPU cores output, it seems BS does balancing and those lines my only become obsolete and interfere with the firmware builds...
I guess i have to be more observant on the subject...
So, far for my needs R7800 its working ok... _________________ Atheros
TP-Link WR740Nv1 ---DD-WRT 53045 WAP
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 -DD-WRT 54420 Gateway/DoT,Forced DNS,AP Isolation,Ad-Block,Firewall,VPN,x1VLAN
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 -DD-WRT 54475 Gateway/DoT,Forced DNS,Ad-Block,Firewall,x4VLAN,VPN
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 -Gargoyle OS 1.15.x AP,DNS,QoS,Quotas
Qualcomm-Atheros
Netgear R7800 --DD-WRT 54475 Gateway/DoT,AD-Block,Forced DNS,AP&Net Isolation,x3VLAN,Firewall,Vanilla
Netgear R9000 --DD-WRT 54475 Gateway/DoT,AD-Block,AP Isolation,Firewall,Forced DNS,x2VLAN,Vanilla
Broadcom
Netgear R7000 --DD-WRT 54475 Gateway/SmartDNS/DoH,AD-Block,Firewall,Forced DNS,x3VLAN,VPN
NOT USING 5Ghz ANYWHERE
------------------------------------------------------
Stubby DNS over TLS I DNSCrypt v2 by mac913
Unfortunately, since a few builds, clients cannot see the AP any more when Wireless encryption is active.
All clients (different brands) cannot see the Wifi Router any more
It seems the bug has been introduced with 12-21-2019-r41771. Build 12-10-2019-r41686 still works fine. For all later builds, Wifi is not visible if encryption active.
Router Model: TP-Link TL-WDR4300 v1
CPU Model: Atheros AR9344 ver 1 rev 1.2 (0x2122)
Wireless Chipset: AR934x 802.11n WiSOC
Wireless mode: AP (ath0 + ath1)
Encryption: WPA Personal + AES
Unfortunately, since a few builds, clients cannot see the AP any more when Wireless encryption is active.
All clients (different brands) cannot see the Wifi Router any more
It seems the bug has been introduced with 12-21-2019-r41771. Build 12-10-2019-r41686 still works fine. For all later builds, Wifi is not visible if encryption active.
That seems to be exactly my experience (Router: TP-Link TL-WDR3600 v1).