Router Model:
Status:
Reset:
Errors: _________________ Segment 1 XR700 10Gb LAN, 1Gb WAN ISP BS
Wired AP 1 Unifi Wifi 6 LR US 1Gb LAN
Wired AP 2 Unifi Wifi 6 LR US 1Gb LAN
Wired AP 3 Unifi Wifi 6 LR US 1Gb LAN
Syslog Services Asustor 7110T NAS 10GB
NetGear XS716T 10GB Switch
download1.dd-wrt.com/dd-wrtv2/downloads/betas/ (Brain Slayer)
YAMon https://usage-monitoring.com/index.php
The R9000's took 5 minutes to settle on initial load.
Main Router and AP's seem to be running ok. _________________ Segment 1 XR700 10Gb LAN, 1Gb WAN ISP BS
Wired AP 1 Unifi Wifi 6 LR US 1Gb LAN
Wired AP 2 Unifi Wifi 6 LR US 1Gb LAN
Wired AP 3 Unifi Wifi 6 LR US 1Gb LAN
Syslog Services Asustor 7110T NAS 10GB
NetGear XS716T 10GB Switch
download1.dd-wrt.com/dd-wrtv2/downloads/betas/ (Brain Slayer)
YAMon https://usage-monitoring.com/index.php
@Hackintosh yeah what's up with your upload test were there active uploading jobs while you were testing? try hfsc-fqcodelfast-78000-10000-all tcp packet priorities checked-all else as defaults
@tatsuya46 your tcp packets qos issue is that only for low speed and/or is it with netmask limit? i thought your line is 100+ mbps? https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/6769#comment:5
Joined: 03 Jan 2010 Posts: 7568 Location: YWG, Canada
Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2019 16:18 Post subject:
jerrytouille wrote:
@Hackintosh yeah what's up with your upload test were there active uploading jobs while you were testing? try hfsc-fqcodelfast-78000-10000-all tcp packet priorities checked-all else as defaults
@tatsuya46 your tcp packets qos issue is that only for low speed and/or is it with netmask limit? i thought your line is 100+ mbps? https://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/6769#comment:5
no it doesnt work now, period. low rates just make it more clear to illistrate but it affects all speeds. qos has problems at high speeds and low speeds.. low speeds had a work around with tcp packet priorities but now even thats broken _________________ LATEST FIRMWARE(S)
BrainSlayer wrote:
we just do it since we do not like any restrictions enforced by stupid cocaine snorting managers
EA8500
DD-WRT v3.0-r40784 std (08/25/19)
Linux 4.9.190-rc1 #461 SMP Sat Aug 24 16:06:52 CEST 2019 armv7l
used as WAN disable switch / ovpn server / samba share ext4
GUI install. No reset. Everything working good
#
WNDR3700v4
DD-WRT v3.0-r40784 std (08/25/19)
Linux 3.18.140 #51588 Sun Aug 25 03:26:42 +04 2019 mips
used as WAN disable switch / ovpn server / samba share ext4
GUI install. No reset. Everything good.
#
WRT160NL
DD-WRT v3.0-r40784 std (08/25/19)
Linux 3.10.108-d8 #19776 Sun Aug 25 01:56:26 +04 2019 mips
used as WAN disable switch / samba share
GUI install. No reset. All good
NOTE:
I did a reboot on all three these units and samba comes back & works just fine
#
main router EA8500 is on r40774 and working very well
AND
I have all 'TCP-Packet Priority' unchecked ...seems to work better this way for me
MY ISP's internet plan is 100 Mbps down and 10 Mbps up
The cable modem they provide is the older DOCSIS 3.0 Arris TM822A
Looking at the speed test I don't see anything unusual. I get about 80-90 down in my area with 10-12 up in my area during the day. C or B rating for buffer bloat is fairly normal.
Someone may have been playing Netflix in the other room during the test (unsure). But looking at the results, I do not understand exactly what you think is wrong. You'll have to be very clear on that.
Joined: 03 Jan 2010 Posts: 7568 Location: YWG, Canada
Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2019 19:06 Post subject:
Hackintosh wrote:
Maybe I'm not seeing what any of you are seeing.
MY ISP's internet plan is 100 Mbps down and 10 Mbps up
The cable modem they provide is the older DOCSIS 3.0 Arris TM822A
Looking at the speed test I don't see anything unusual. I get about 80-90 down in my area with 10-12 up in my area during the day. C or B rating for buffer bloat is fairly normal.
Someone may have been playing Netflix in the other room during the test (unsure). But looking at the results, I do not understand exactly what you think is wrong. You'll have to be very clear on that.
do u not notice ur own upload latency..? its horrible, unusable in tons of cases what i dont know is how u find that "normal" or "fine" etc.. tcp packet priority setting would help here if it was working. _________________ LATEST FIRMWARE(S)
BrainSlayer wrote:
we just do it since we do not like any restrictions enforced by stupid cocaine snorting managers