Bug or expected? MAC address on virtual wifi interface

Post new topic   Reply to topic    DD-WRT Forum Index -> Broadcom SoC based Hardware
Author Message
SirDracula
DD-WRT User


Joined: 16 Feb 2007
Posts: 127

PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 20:35    Post subject: Bug or expected? MAC address on virtual wifi interface Reply with quote
Asus RT-AC68U
Kong v3.0-r38100M kongac 12/27/18

The 2.4 interface (eth1) has a MAC address AC:9E:17:xx:yy:EA

If I create a virtual interface wl0.1 on the same radio and apply settings, it gets a MAC address of AE:9E:17:xx:yy:EB

Is it a bug that the first byte changes from AC to AE? This does not sound right to me. If I do a OUI search, AE:9E:17 prefix is not even registered!
Sponsor
Alozaros
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 6447
Location: UK, London, just across the river..

PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 20:57    Post subject: Reply with quote
yep its normal and its a must...
_________________
Atheros
TP-Link WR740Nv1 ---DD-WRT 55630 WAP
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 -DD-WRT 55723 Gateway/DoT,Forced DNS,Ad-Block,Firewall,x4VLAN,VPN
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 -Gargoyle OS 1.15.x AP,DNS,QoS,Quotas
Qualcomm-Atheros
Netgear XR500 --DD-WRT 55779 Gateway/DoH,Forced DNS,AP Isolation,4VLAN,Ad-Block,Firewall,Vanilla
Netgear R7800 --DD-WRT 55819 Gateway/DoT,AD-Block,Forced DNS,AP&Net Isolation,x3VLAN,Firewall,Vanilla
Netgear R9000 --DD-WRT 55779 Gateway/DoT,AD-Block,AP Isolation,Firewall,Forced DNS,x2VLAN,Vanilla
Broadcom
Netgear R7000 --DD-WRT 55460 Gateway/SmartDNS/DoH,AD-Block,Firewall,Forced DNS,x3VLAN,VPN
NOT USING 5Ghz ANYWHERE
------------------------------------------------------
Stubby DNS over TLS I DNSCrypt v2 by mac913
SirDracula
DD-WRT User


Joined: 16 Feb 2007
Posts: 127

PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 20:59    Post subject: Reply with quote
Nevermind, this answer clarifies it:
https://serverfault.com/questions/40712/what-range-of-mac-addresses-can-i-safely-use-for-my-virtual-machines

Quote:

There are actually 4 sets of Locally Administered Address Ranges that can be used on your network without fear of conflict, assuming no one else has assigned these on your network:

x2-xx-xx-xx-xx-xx
x6-xx-xx-xx-xx-xx
xA-xx-xx-xx-xx-xx
xE-xx-xx-xx-xx-xx

Replacing x with any hex value.


So AE: would be a valid locally administered prefix.


Last edited by SirDracula on Wed Jan 23, 2019 23:22; edited 1 time in total
Display posts from previous:    Page 1 of 1
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DD-WRT Forum Index -> Broadcom SoC based Hardware All times are GMT

Navigation

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum