Joined: 16 Nov 2015 Posts: 6388 Location: UK, London, just across the river..
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2018 18:44 Post subject:
the most powerful router must be the edge router so
R8500 as Gateway and VPN/Firewall and ect, than use
R7000 as a secondary router either bridged with no NAT or as a WAP or as an AP with NAT and VPN/firewall and ect....
you can fairly run wndr4300 in WAP mode so nothing special on it that requires CPU as it has the slowest CPU among the other it will be just extension of your main network
the other option is you can divide DHCP and DNS on 2 different routers and leave VPN of the one with more power _________________ Atheros
TP-Link WR740Nv1 ---DD-WRT 55179 WAP
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 -DD-WRT 55303 Gateway/DoT,Forced DNS,AP Isolation,Ad-Block,Firewall
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 -DD-WRT 55303 Gateway/DoT,Forced DNS,Ad-Block,Firewall,x4VLAN,VPN
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 -Gargoyle OS 1.15.x AP,DNS,QoS,Quotas
Qualcomm-Atheros
Netgear R7800 --DD-WRT 55363 Gateway/DoT,AD-Block,Forced DNS,AP&Net Isolation,x3VLAN,Firewall,Vanilla
Netgear R9000 --DD-WRT 55363 Gateway/DoT,AD-Block,AP Isolation,Firewall,Forced DNS,x2VLAN,Vanilla
Broadcom
Netgear R7000 --DD-WRT 55363 Gateway/SmartDNS/DoH,AD-Block,Firewall,Forced DNS,x3VLAN,VPN
NOT USING 5Ghz ANYWHERE
------------------------------------------------------
Stubby DNS over TLS I DNSCrypt v2 by mac913
The most powerful router would be running the VPN gateway.
Would there be trouble in the setup with the WNDR4300 as the lead router off the modem (primary gateway)? It wouldn't be running the VPN itself, or used for wireless. Essentially, it would be for DHCP and NAT/Firewall.
Not all devices on my network will be using the VPN, specifically media devices such as droid TV boxes or Smart TVs and Blu Rays.
Devices that I want to use the VPN will be configured to manually run to that router by setting it as the gateway.
Do you think that setting the WNDR4300 as the lead router will congest internet traffic, or the local network traffic itself?
Joined: 16 Nov 2015 Posts: 6388 Location: UK, London, just across the river..
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2018 19:15 Post subject:
it depends from your ISP wan speed as routers with low specs can see much speed in NAT mode Gateway... _________________ Atheros
TP-Link WR740Nv1 ---DD-WRT 55179 WAP
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 -DD-WRT 55303 Gateway/DoT,Forced DNS,AP Isolation,Ad-Block,Firewall
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 -DD-WRT 55303 Gateway/DoT,Forced DNS,Ad-Block,Firewall,x4VLAN,VPN
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 -Gargoyle OS 1.15.x AP,DNS,QoS,Quotas
Qualcomm-Atheros
Netgear R7800 --DD-WRT 55363 Gateway/DoT,AD-Block,Forced DNS,AP&Net Isolation,x3VLAN,Firewall,Vanilla
Netgear R9000 --DD-WRT 55363 Gateway/DoT,AD-Block,AP Isolation,Firewall,Forced DNS,x2VLAN,Vanilla
Broadcom
Netgear R7000 --DD-WRT 55363 Gateway/SmartDNS/DoH,AD-Block,Firewall,Forced DNS,x3VLAN,VPN
NOT USING 5Ghz ANYWHERE
------------------------------------------------------
Stubby DNS over TLS I DNSCrypt v2 by mac913
it depends from your ISP wan speed as routers with low specs can see much speed in NAT mode Gateway...
Download speed seems to max around 130 mbps, which may be the limitation of the modem. Currently the plan I have, the default internet plan for cable modem, goes to 150 mbps down, 10 mbps up.