Router Model TPLINK WR1043ND V2
Firmware: DD-WRT v3.0-r35244 std (03/05/18 )
Time: 09:12:05 up 21:57, load average: 0.03, 0.02, 0.0
Status: OK
Reset: No . It keeps all my settings.
Updated from 02-17-2018-r35034 using web GUI.
I have VPN server set, dnsmasq, 2 wifi networks
I have in syslog some strange lines .
ar 7 13:30:57 DD-WRT_g daemon.err httpd[4694]: Request Error Code 408: No request appeared within a reasonable time period.
Mar 7 13:30:57 DD-WRT_g daemon.err httpd[4694]: Request Error Code 408: No request appeared within a reasonable time period.
Mar 7 13:30:57 DD-WRT_g daemon.err httpd[4694]: Request Error Code 408: No request appeared within a reasonable time period.
Mar 7 13:30:57 DD-WRT_g daemon.err httpd[4694]: Request Error Code 408: No request appeared within a reasonable time period.
Mar 7 13:30:57 DD-WRT_g daemon.err httpd[4694]: Request Error Code 408: No request appeared within a reasonable time period.
Mar 7 13:30:57 DD-WRT_g daemon.err httpd[4694]: Request Error Code 408: No request appeared within a reasonable time period.
Mar 7 13:30:57 DD-WRT_g daemon.err httpd[4694]: Request Error Code 408: No request appeared within a reasonable time period.
Mar 7 13:30:57 DD-WRT_g daemon.err httpd[4694]: Request Error Code 408: No request appeared within a reasonable time period.
Mar 7 13:30:57 DD-WRT_g daemon.err httpd[4694]: Request Error Code 408: No request appeared within a reasonable time period.
Mar 7 13:30:58 DD-WRT_g daemon.err httpd[4694]: Request Error Code 408: No request appeared within a reasonable time period.
Mar 7 13:30:58 DD-WRT_g daemon.err httpd[4694]: Request Error Code 408: No request appeared within a reasonable time period.
Mar 7 13:31:27 DD-WRT_g daemon.err httpd[4694]: Request Error Code 408: No request appeared within a reasonable time period.
Mar 7 13:31:31 DD-WRT_g daemon.err httpd[4694]: Request Error Code 408: No request appeared within a reasonable time period.
Mar 7 13:31:31 DD-WRT_g daemon.err httpd[4694]: Request Error Code 408: No request appeared within a reasonable time period.
Mar 7 13:31:31 DD-WRT_g daemon.err httpd[4694]: Request Error Code 408: No request appeared within a reasonable time period.
Mar 7 13:31:31 DD-WRT_g daemon.err httpd[4694]: Request Error Code 408: No request appeared within a reasonable time period.
Mar 7 13:31:31 DD-WRT_g daemon.err httpd[4694]: Request Error Code 408: No request appeared within a reasonable time period.
....
Has anyone of you guys running the 1043nd had issues with the wifi going down and not coming back up in the last releases? I'm still using the r34311 (I tried other versions but given the ntp issue, this one seemed the most stable and without that problem), but sometimes I loose the wifi with no computer finding it. The light goes dark, and I have to reboot the router.
I never experienced it before as I usually turn off the router during the night but I wanted to change places with my main router and this one and decided to let it on for a few weeks and check the stability. The first time this happened, the 1043 was up for about 8 days. The last time was a couple of days ago, when I formatted one of my laptops and had to synchronise google drive again (580gb) when I used the wired connection for about 300gb and then decided to use the wifi connection just as a brute force test, and after probably 200GB download the wifi connection was down.
We are not heavy users (just 2 with about 8/9 wifi devices: laptops, ipads smartphones) but I really wanted stability for not having my wife asking me all the time why the internet is down!!! I hardly use wired connections. The router is connected via powerline to my ISP router, which distributes ip addresses.
Joined: 16 Nov 2015 Posts: 6446 Location: UK, London, just across the river..
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 15:26 Post subject:
my 1043ndv2 has no issues with WiFi and never had so far its rock solid...
but 1043nd v1.x has a lot of issues and its generally belied, its a crap unit, so consider replacing it or your
wife will get mad on you _________________ Atheros
TP-Link WR740Nv1 ---DD-WRT 55630 WAP
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 -DD-WRT 55723 Gateway/DoT,Forced DNS,Ad-Block,Firewall,x4VLAN,VPN
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 -Gargoyle OS 1.15.x AP,DNS,QoS,Quotas
Qualcomm-Atheros
Netgear XR500 --DD-WRT 55779 Gateway/DoH,Forced DNS,AP Isolation,4VLAN,Ad-Block,Firewall,Vanilla
Netgear R7800 --DD-WRT 55819 Gateway/DoT,AD-Block,Forced DNS,AP&Net Isolation,x3VLAN,Firewall,Vanilla
Netgear R9000 --DD-WRT 55779 Gateway/DoT,AD-Block,AP Isolation,Firewall,Forced DNS,x2VLAN,Vanilla
Broadcom
Netgear R7000 --DD-WRT 55460 Gateway/SmartDNS/DoH,AD-Block,Firewall,Forced DNS,x3VLAN,VPN
NOT USING 5Ghz ANYWHERE
------------------------------------------------------
Stubby DNS over TLS I DNSCrypt v2 by mac913
Router Model TP-Link 841ND V9
Firmware Version DD-WRT v3.0-r35244 std (03/05/2018 )
Kernel Version Linux 3.18.98 #8777 Mon Mar 5 04:44:06 CET 2018 mipsmips
Status - Ok
Reset - No
Errors - YES
SES / AOSS / EZ-SETUP / WPS Button ->
Turning off radio -> Enable
Turn radio off at boot -> Enable
After loading the new firmware the wifi networks become active and the devices connect to the wifi (!) at start. The LED dedicated to making visible that the wifi networks are active remains off but that of the connection flashes as the devices are connected. I tried to restart the router but the problem remains.Up to now with the other firmware the problem was not present.
Even if I press the appropriate button, the wifi networks remain active regardless of whether the dedicated LED is on or off.
--> Downgrade previous stable version.
Last edited by Frakko on Fri Mar 09, 2018 16:13; edited 1 time in total
my 1043ndv2 has no issues with WiFi and never had so far its rock solid...
but 1043nd v1.x has a lot of issues and its generally belied, its a crap unit, so consider replacing it or your
wife will get mad on you
Joined: 16 Nov 2015 Posts: 6446 Location: UK, London, just across the river..
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 18:26 Post subject:
dasnick wrote:
Alozaros wrote:
my 1043ndv2 has no issues with WiFi and never had so far its rock solid...
but 1043nd v1.x has a lot of issues and its generally belied, its a crap unit, so consider replacing it or your
wife will get mad on you
mine is a v3... I have a v1 but its not in use...
well v3 has a regular and US version i guess yours is US version and if im not wrong, they are country domain/TX power fixed, so not much to do...
anyway if its not due to bad WiFi settings than its something either on client side or something like a bad radio hardware, stick to the build that's ok.... _________________ Atheros
TP-Link WR740Nv1 ---DD-WRT 55630 WAP
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 -DD-WRT 55723 Gateway/DoT,Forced DNS,Ad-Block,Firewall,x4VLAN,VPN
TP-Link WR1043NDv2 -Gargoyle OS 1.15.x AP,DNS,QoS,Quotas
Qualcomm-Atheros
Netgear XR500 --DD-WRT 55779 Gateway/DoH,Forced DNS,AP Isolation,4VLAN,Ad-Block,Firewall,Vanilla
Netgear R7800 --DD-WRT 55819 Gateway/DoT,AD-Block,Forced DNS,AP&Net Isolation,x3VLAN,Firewall,Vanilla
Netgear R9000 --DD-WRT 55779 Gateway/DoT,AD-Block,AP Isolation,Firewall,Forced DNS,x2VLAN,Vanilla
Broadcom
Netgear R7000 --DD-WRT 55460 Gateway/SmartDNS/DoH,AD-Block,Firewall,Forced DNS,x3VLAN,VPN
NOT USING 5Ghz ANYWHERE
------------------------------------------------------
Stubby DNS over TLS I DNSCrypt v2 by mac913
Ok, so I've been lurking around here for ages and following the discussions. I was using a very old dd-wrt version on my TPLINK TL-WDR3600 v1 and updated because of the one big bug. Since then I couldn't get my router to run smoothly anymore. I'm now on version 33986, and though some people have reported this version do be good for my model, I only get good performance after a restart, but soon after that my connection starts getting slower and slower until I finally have to reboot after just about 1 hour. So, the question of them all: can anybody recommend a firmware version which will work well with my old router? I still kind of like it, and don't want to change it. Thanks a lot!!
I skipped 33986. 33772 was a good build, but now I'm on 35034 and it works smoothly. What do you use on your WDR3600? _________________ TP-Link TL-WDR3600 v1
DD-WRT v3.0-r42366 std (02/14/20)
Linux 3.10.108-d10 #38381
Ok, so I've been lurking around here for ages and following the discussions. I was using a very old dd-wrt version on my TPLINK TL-WDR3600 v1 and updated because of the one big bug. Since then I couldn't get my router to run smoothly anymore. I'm now on version 33986, and though some people have reported this version do be good for my model, I only get good performance after a restart, but soon after that my connection starts getting slower and slower until I finally have to reboot after just about 1 hour. So, the question of them all: can anybody recommend a firmware version which will work well with my old router? I still kind of like it, and don't want to change it. Thanks a lot!!
I skipped 33986. 33772 was a good build, but now I'm on 35034 and it works smoothly. What do you use on your WDR3600?
I probably do not use mine like kroolas does, I use mine as a utility router and mostly as a wireless client for other computers. It is not on all the time but it works with this firmware thread, standard errors (such as the httpd login error, ntp logged as error when it is success)
Has anyone of you guys running the 1043nd had issues with the wifi going down and not coming back up in the last releases? I'm still using the r34311 (I tried other versions but given the ntp issue, this one seemed the most stable and without that problem), but sometimes I loose the wifi with no computer finding it. The light goes dark, and I have to reboot the router.
I never experienced it before as I usually turn off the router during the night but I wanted to change places with my main router and this one and decided to let it on for a few weeks and check the stability. The first time this happened, the 1043 was up for about 8 days. The last time was a couple of days ago, when I formatted one of my laptops and had to synchronise google drive again (580gb) when I used the wired connection for about 300gb and then decided to use the wifi connection just as a brute force test, and after probably 200GB download the wifi connection was down.
We are not heavy users (just 2 with about 8/9 wifi devices: laptops, ipads smartphones) but I really wanted stability for not having my wife asking me all the time why the internet is down!!! I hardly use wired connections. The router is connected via powerline to my ISP router, which distributes ip addresses.
If you own a 1043ND V3, build r34929 is very solid
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2018 2:12 Post subject: TL841 v9 good
Two of the TL841 v9's run my home network and are working fine after about an hour so far. One of them is just an additional wired AP located a floor up. Still feel limited with cpu for NAT, with SFE enabled I still only get 60-70megabit maxes on a 100meg service. Anyone found a trick to squeeze more out of this model? Disabling the wan traffic counter seems to help by about 10megabit.
Has anyone of you guys running the 1043nd had issues with the wifi going down and not coming back up in the last releases? I'm still using the r34311 (I tried other versions but given the ntp issue, this one seemed the most stable and without that problem), but sometimes I loose the wifi with no computer finding it. The light goes dark, and I have to reboot the router.
I never experienced it before as I usually turn off the router during the night but I wanted to change places with my main router and this one and decided to let it on for a few weeks and check the stability. The first time this happened, the 1043 was up for about 8 days. The last time was a couple of days ago, when I formatted one of my laptops and had to synchronise google drive again (580gb) when I used the wired connection for about 300gb and then decided to use the wifi connection just as a brute force test, and after probably 200GB download the wifi connection was down.
We are not heavy users (just 2 with about 8/9 wifi devices: laptops, ipads smartphones) but I really wanted stability for not having my wife asking me all the time why the internet is down!!! I hardly use wired connections. The router is connected via powerline to my ISP router, which distributes ip addresses.
If you own a 1043ND V3, build r34929 is very solid
Has anyone of you guys running the 1043nd had issues with the wifi going down and not coming back up in the last releases? I'm still using the r34311 (I tried other versions but given the ntp issue, this one seemed the most stable and without that problem), but sometimes I loose the wifi with no computer finding it. The light goes dark, and I have to reboot the router.
I never experienced it before as I usually turn off the router during the night but I wanted to change places with my main router and this one and decided to let it on for a few weeks and check the stability. The first time this happened, the 1043 was up for about 8 days. The last time was a couple of days ago, when I formatted one of my laptops and had to synchronise google drive again (580gb) when I used the wired connection for about 300gb and then decided to use the wifi connection just as a brute force test, and after probably 200GB download the wifi connection was down.
We are not heavy users (just 2 with about 8/9 wifi devices: laptops, ipads smartphones) but I really wanted stability for not having my wife asking me all the time why the internet is down!!! I hardly use wired connections. The router is connected via powerline to my ISP router, which distributes ip addresses.
If you own a 1043ND V3, build r34929 is very solid
Does that version have the NTP issue?
What do you consider the NTP issue? Brainslayer fixed the ipv4 vs ipv6 issue, so ntp works fine now. NTP does give an error every hour, when it actually synced and is a success (wrong log stream in code)
Joined: 25 Jun 2014 Posts: 142 Location: São Paulo - Brazil
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 15:41 Post subject:
TP-Link TL-WR841ND v11
DD-WRT v3.0-r35244 std (03/05/18 )
Linux 3.18.98 #8767 Mon Mar 5 04:32:43 CET 2018 mips
Status: OK
Reset: NO
Errors: NTP in Client Bridge (Routed) not working and Request Error Code 401: Authorization required. please note that the default username is "root" in all newer releases (Spam)
