Search found 92 matches
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 Topic: [dnsmasq] : maybe died, we need to re-exec it issue |
|
| Megrez7 Replies: 92 Views: 35632 |
 Forum: Broadcom SoC based Hardware Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:38 Subject: [dnsmasq] : maybe died, we need to re-exec it issue |
| Not blaming anything nor anyone! Just as I see few more people having the same issue, I am trying to help to solve it.
These are two simple unmanaged TP-Link TL-SG105 switches. Only one DHCP server ... |
|
 |
|
| Topic: [dnsmasq] : maybe died, we need to re-exec it issue |
|
| Megrez7 Replies: 92 Views: 35632 |
Forum: Broadcom SoC based Hardware Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2024 8:42 Subject: [dnsmasq] : maybe died, we need to re-exec it issue |
| @kernel-panic69 Yes I tried and followed all recommendations and sent logs as per instructions as I was writing in this thread in the past. Furthermore I have reset the router two times in the last 3 ... | |
|
|
| Topic: [dnsmasq] : maybe died, we need to re-exec it issue |
|
| Megrez7 Replies: 92 Views: 35632 |
Forum: Broadcom SoC based Hardware Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2024 21:21 Subject: [dnsmasq] : maybe died, we need to re-exec it issue |
| @kernel-panic69 Is this a time we shall create a ticket at svn.dd-wrt.com? | |
|
|
| Topic: [dnsmasq] : maybe died, we need to re-exec it issue |
|
| Megrez7 Replies: 92 Views: 35632 |
Forum: Broadcom SoC based Hardware Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2024 21:18 Subject: [dnsmasq] : maybe died, we need to re-exec it issue |
| I am now at 04/16/2024 - r55799 and the issue still exists with Netgear R6400v2. There are moments where dnsmasq reboots even 3 times within an hour and then not even once for a day. | |
|
|
| Topic: WireGuard obfuscation on Windows client ideas |
|
| Megrez7 Replies: 6 Views: 1172 |
Forum: Advanced Networking Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2024 0:03 Subject: WireGuard obfuscation on Windows client ideas |
| Anyone able and willing to help with this? | |
|
|
| Topic: WireGuard obfuscation on Windows client ideas |
|
| Megrez7 Replies: 6 Views: 1172 |
Forum: Advanced Networking Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2024 11:31 Subject: WireGuard obfuscation on Windows client ideas |
| The last attachment here due to the limit. | |
|
|
| Topic: WireGuard obfuscation on Windows client ideas |
|
| Megrez7 Replies: 6 Views: 1172 |
Forum: Advanced Networking Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2024 11:31 Subject: WireGuard obfuscation on Windows client ideas |
| Thanks for the suggestion with travel router. That will work but I am looking for "self-contained" solution. Having read https://github.com/infinet/xt_wgobfs documentation I decided to go ch ... | |
|
|
| Topic: WireGuard obfuscation on Windows client ideas |
|
| Megrez7 Replies: 6 Views: 1172 |
Forum: Advanced Networking Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 14:15 Subject: WireGuard obfuscation on Windows client ideas |
| Thanks for clarification on ChaCha.
Two routers would work for stationary implementation at the office or home. However this is not suitable for travelling. There must be some solution for su ... |
|
|
|
| Topic: WireGuard obfuscation on Windows client ideas |
|
| Megrez7 Replies: 6 Views: 1172 |
Forum: Advanced Networking Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 23:40 Subject: WireGuard obfuscation on Windows client ideas |
| Obfuscation is very interesting feature within WireGuard, what would allow to use of WireGuard from some countries using Deep Packet Inspection.
Over last few days I have been trying to find a way ... |
|
|
|
| Topic: IPTABLES rule for WireGuard accepting peer on few ports |
|
| Megrez7 Replies: 5 Views: 626 |
Forum: Advanced Networking Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 13:01 Subject: IPTABLES rule for WireGuard accepting peer on few ports |
| Thi slightly modified rule works
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -d <router-public-IP> -p udp -m multiport --dports 53,80,123,443,1194,1197,1198,8080,9201 -j REDIRECT --to-ports 51811 I have r ... |
|
|
|
| Topic: IPTABLES rule for WireGuard accepting peer on few ports |
|
| Megrez7 Replies: 5 Views: 626 |
Forum: Advanced Networking Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 12:08 Subject: IPTABLES rule for WireGuard accepting peer on few ports |
| I might be not too clear.
I use WireGuard on the router as a server. Tunnel is configured to listen at port 51811. I would like to enable few additional ports which might be used by clients to con ... |
|
|
|
| Topic: IPTABLES rule for WireGuard accepting peer on few ports |
|
| Megrez7 Replies: 5 Views: 626 |
Forum: Advanced Networking Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2024 20:58 Subject: IPTABLES rule for WireGuard accepting peer on few ports |
| In some countries VPNs as well as WireGuard are blocked as per ports being used, so I am trying to set up a rule which will enable peers to use other ports, including well-known ones.
WireGuard tun ... |
|
|
|
| Topic: IPTABLES does not work |
|
| Megrez7 Replies: 6 Views: 529 |
Forum: Advanced Networking Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2024 19:37 Subject: IPTABLES does not work |
| Works!
Can you please explain why that works after adding "wait 20"? And why it used to work without it in the past? |
|
|
|
| Topic: IPTABLES does not work |
|
| Megrez7 Replies: 6 Views: 529 |
Forum: Advanced Networking Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2024 19:12 Subject: IPTABLES does not work |
| It was disabled by default after router Reset and still is.
I did not touch it. Could it be it shows disabled but is enabled in fact? Shall I enable and re-disable then? |
|
|
|
| Topic: IPTABLES does not work |
|
| Megrez7 Replies: 6 Views: 529 |
Forum: Advanced Networking Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2024 18:40 Subject: IPTABLES does not work |
| Looks like entries are there. I have truncated for brevity once rules we talk about occured.
One more comment. Flow Acceleration: DISABLED Shortcut Forwarding Engine: DISABLED, however tried alre ... |
|
|
|
| All times are GMT |